Universal method of structural design and assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional construction methods require multiple workers to assemble structural members, posing safety risks when adequate labor is not available, and often result in structures that cannot be easily disassembled or reconfigured.

Innovation Solution

A modular construction system using interlocking planar components that can be assembled and disassembled sequentially by a single individual, allowing for the creation of various shapes and structures with interchangeable parts, including walls, roofs, and partitions, which can be easily reconfigured or expanded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional construction methods are used with multiple workers, then structural members can be assembled, but safety risks increase when adequate labor is not available and structures cannot be easily disassembled

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAssembly capabilityVSAvoidSafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into modular components (walls, floors, roofs, partitions) that can be independently assembled and disassembled. Each module features standardized interlocking mechanisms with protrusions and cavities, allowing single-person assembly while maintaining structural integrity and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interlocking mechanisms are designed to be dynamically adjustable, featuring movable protrusions that can be inserted into cavities and locked in place. The system transitions from a static permanent construction approach to a dynamic reusable system where components can be easily assembled and disassembled by one person.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If permanent attachment methods are used, then structural stability is achieved, but the structure cannot be disassembled and reconfigured

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveStructural stabilityVSAvoidReconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The design enables recovery of structural components after use. The interlocking mechanisms allow complete disassembly of the structure into its modular components, which can then be transported and reassembled in different configurations. The protrusion-cavity system is designed to be reusable without degradation, enabling multiple assembly cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The modular components are designed with universal interlocking features that can be used in multiple configurations. The same wall modules, floor panels, and partition elements can be assembled in various arrangements to create different room layouts and structures, providing both stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If traditional construction methods are used, then structures can be built, but assembly time and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAssembly speedVSAvoidAssembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

All structural components are pre-manufactured with standardized interlocking features (protrusions and cavities) before delivery to the construction site. The modules are prepared in advance with precise dimensions and attachment points, eliminating the need for on-site cutting, fitting, or complex joining operations, thereby dramatically reducing assembly time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple structural functions are combined into single modular components. Wall modules include integrated framing, insulation, and finishing elements. Floor panels combine structural support with surface finishing. This consolidation reduces the number of separate assembly operations required and enables single-person rapid assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9556605B2Universal method of structural design and assembly
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 ELLIOTT JOSEPH
  • US9556605B2 patent drawing
  • US9556605B2 patent drawing
  • US9556605B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural system and method of assembly comprising structural members with slots, and interior structural members. Specific structural members are sequentially interconnected in rigid alignment. A first structural member is positioned with two upward facing slots. Additional structural members are added by engaging downward facing slots of the additional structure members with upward facing slots of the prior structural member. The structural members further include engagement features in cooperating slots. A protruding features engages a recess to retain the engaged structural members. The features may be a partial sphere and a matching recess which may be disassembly, or a tapered protrusion having a squared-off rear edge which resists disassembly, or one of a variety of shapes.