Modular Intervertebral Prosthesis With Anchored End Plates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional intervertebral disc prostheses often require repeated surgical procedures due to wear or destruction, involving complex implantation and potential loosening of cemented implants, which complicates revisions and compromises bone stability.

Innovation Solution

The use of permanently anchored artificial vertebral end plates with oblique bores for injecting osteoconductive or osteoinductive materials, combined with mechanical fixation via pins or serrations, allows for detachable attachment of replaceable modules, ensuring even pressure distribution and stabilization, and enabling revisions without disturbing bone anchoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If cement is used to fasten the implant to the vertebrae, then the implant is initially secured, but cement parts can crumble off due to movements and vibrations, leading to loosening of the implant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial fixation strengthVSAvoidlong-term fixation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis is divided into modular components: a permanently anchored mounting module and replaceable functional modules. The mounting module with artificial vertebral end plates remains fixed to the vertebrae via pins and osteoinductive material, while functional modules can be detached and replaced without disturbing the bone anchoring, thus maintaining long-term reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the cement-based chemical bonding system with a mechanical fixation system using pins, staples, or screws that pass through the artificial vertebral end plates into the vertebrae. This mechanical system provides reliable long-term fixation without the crumbling issue of cement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the entire prosthesis is replaced during revision surgery, then wear or destruction issues are addressed, but the surgical procedure becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprosthesis functionalityVSAvoidsurgical procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis is segmented into a permanent mounting module and replaceable functional modules. During revision surgery, only the worn functional module needs to be removed and replaced, while the mounting module remains in place. This significantly simplifies the surgical procedure compared to replacing the entire prosthesis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting module is permanently anchored during the initial surgery with pins and osteoinductive material. This preliminary action creates a stable foundation that allows for simple future revisions by only replacing the functional module, reducing the complexity of subsequent surgical procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the entire prosthesis is replaced during revision surgery, then wear or destruction issues are addressed, but bone material is reduced due to repeated operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprosthesis functionalityVSAvoidbone material loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the prosthesis into a permanent mounting module and replaceable functional modules, the bone anchoring is established once during initial surgery. Subsequent revisions only involve changing the functional module without disturbing the bone-anchored mounting module, thereby preventing cumulative bone material loss from repeated operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The functional module that experiences wear or destruction is extracted and replaced, while the mounting module that is anchored to the bone remains in place. This extraction approach allows for revision surgery without removing and re-implanting the bone-anchored components, preserving bone material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional implantation procedures are used, then prostheses can be implanted, but the procedure is complicated and may require repeated surgeries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation feasibilityVSAvoidsurgical efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular design with permanently anchored mounting modules and replaceable functional modules allows for a simplified revision procedure. The surgeon only needs to detach and replace the functional module through a minimally invasive approach, significantly improving surgical efficiency compared to conventional full-replacement procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting module with artificial vertebral end plates serves multiple functions: it provides permanent anchoring to the vertebrae, supports replaceable functional modules, and enables future revisions without complex procedures. This multi-functionality improves overall surgical efficiency across the implant's lifetime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach facilitates faster and less invasive revision surgeries by maintaining bone integrity, allowing for standardized module exchange, reducing surgical complexity, and enabling gentler access routes, while ensuring stable prosthesis fixation and adjustable functionality.

Implementation Method 1

hardenable material with osteoconductive or osteoinductive properties can be injected into the cavities that remain between the apposition plate and the vertebral body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOsteoconduction:

Implementation Method 2

hardenable material with osteoconductive or osteoinductive properties can be injected into the cavities that remain between the apposition plate and the vertebral body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOsteoinduction:

Implementation Method 3

through which hardenable material with osteoconductive or osteoinductive properties or other plastics can be injected into the cavities that remain between the apposition plate and the vertebral body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid injection and hardening:

Implementation Method 4

the vertebral end plate according to the invention is fixed by means of pins, serrations or the like, which ensures permanent attachment to the vertebral end plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP3035892B1Modular prostheses
Publication Date: 2016.08.03 GLOBAL MEDICAL CONSULTING
  • EP3035892B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2a
  • EP3035892B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3035892B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for implanting modular prostheses and modular prostheses. The invention is characterised in that at least one module is implanted as a support (33, 34) in such a manner that it is fixed over a long period of time and that one or more interchangeable modules (31, 32) can be detachably connected to the support modules (33, 34), e.g. by means of screws (35), such that they can be removed or replaced postoperatively or during a second or third intervention without having to remove the support modules.