Modular Irrigation Controller with Segmented Terminal Blocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing modular irrigation controllers lack flexibility in accommodating varying numbers of irrigation terminals within a standard footprint, require specific module insertion order, and incur additional costs due to separate indoor and outdoor models, as well as complex sensor integration and flow monitoring requirements.

Innovation Solution

A modular irrigation controller with a standard footprint size that supports modules with varying irrigation station terminals, includes surge protection, wireless communication, immediate module display, and a modular transformer for indoor/outdoor conversion, allowing flexible module insertion and retaining programming data, along with integrated sensor terminals and flow monitoring capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If modules with more irrigation terminals are used to increase system capacity, then the number of controlled sprinklers increases, but the controller footprint space increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of irrigation terminalsVSAvoidcontroller footprint space
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into a base unit and removable modules. Each module contains a specific number of terminal blocks for connecting solenoid valves. Users can attach only the modules they need (e.g., one 4-terminal module for 4 valves, or two 4-terminal modules for 8 valves), allowing the controller footprint to match the actual system size rather than requiring space for maximum potential capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller architecture transitions from a fixed two-dimensional footprint to a three-dimensional modular structure. The base controller unit remains compact, while additional terminal capacity is added vertically through stackable modules that attach to the base, effectively utilizing the vertical dimension to increase capacity without expanding the horizontal footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed-number terminal controllers are used to simplify design, then manufacturing is easier, but flexibility to accommodate varying system sizes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller design simplicityVSAvoidflexibility for different system sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into a base unit and removable modules. Each module contains a specific number of terminal blocks for connecting solenoid valves. Users can attach only the modules they need (e.g., one 4-terminal module for 4 valves, or two 4-terminal modules for 8 valves), allowing the controller footprint to match the actual system size rather than requiring space for maximum potential capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base controller unit is designed as a universal platform that can accommodate different combinations of modules. The same base unit can support configurations ranging from 4 to 16 terminals by simply adding or removing modules, making it adaptable to various system sizes without requiring different controller models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If multiple separate controllers are used to control additional valves, then each controller can be optimized for its function, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of controlled valvesVSAvoidnumber of controllers required
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple controller functions are merged into a single base unit. The base controller integrates the microprocessor, display, programming interface, and communication capabilities, while multiple terminal modules can be attached to expand valve control capacity. This consolidation allows one controller to perform the work of multiple separate controllers, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If outdoor-rated controllers are used to enable outdoor installation, then weather resistance is improved, but cost and design complexity increase compared to indoor models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweather resistanceVSAvoiddesign variations for indoor/outdoor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed as a universal platform that can accommodate different combinations of modules. The same base unit can support configurations ranging from 4 to 16 terminals by simply adding or removing modules, making it adaptable to various system sizes without requiring different controller models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7613546B2Modular irrigation controller
Publication Date: 2009.11.03 THE TORO COMPANY
  • US7613546B2 patent drawing
  • US7613546B2 patent drawing
  • US7613546B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a modular controller that connects to irrigation modules with varying station terminals and a standard footprint size. Additionally, the modular controller includes surge protection options, wireless communication with PDA's and other external devices, no required position for each controller module to be connected, immediate display of station modules on the LCD display, retention of a water program if module is removed, communications module for flow monitoring, a modular transformer, rain sensor receiver within the housing, an improved 9-volt batter holder, and other aspects described in the present application.