Modular ISO Container Structure with Arch Roof for Typhoon Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ISO container structures are not wind-resistant enough to withstand typhoon speeds of up to 210 mph and cannot be assembled or disassembled quickly for relocation.

Innovation Solution

A modular ISO container structure comprising multiple ISO containers connected with twist lock connectors and container bridge fittings, featuring a metal corrugated side wall, arch panel roof, and reinforced end walls, which can be assembled and disassembled within weeks, and includes a gutter system and conduit support for stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If ISO containers are connected with standard fittings and assembled quickly, then assembly time is reduced, but wind resistance is insufficient to withstand typhoon speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly timeVSAvoidwind resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into modular ISO container units that can be independently assembled and connected. Each container serves as a discrete module, allowing rapid assembly while maintaining structural integrity through standardized connection points. The segmentation enables quick deployment without compromising overall wind resistance when properly connected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple ISO containers are merged into a unified structure through specialized connection systems. The combination of containers with reinforced end walls, arch panel roofs, and twist lock connectors creates an integrated assembly that achieves wind resistance comparable to permanent structures while retaining modular assembly benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the structure is made relocatable with modular components, then mobility is improved, but structural stability and wind resistance are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverelocatabilityVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structure employs dynamic connection systems that adapt between transport and operational states. During relocation, containers are disconnected and moved independently. When assembled, the same containers form a stable permanent-like structure through reinforced connections including twist locks, bridge fittings, and anchored end walls that resist typhoon forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The structural parameters change between transport and operational configurations. During transport, the structure is divided into separate container units. When assembled for use, additional connection elements are engaged and bracing systems are activated, transforming the parameter set from mobile units to a unified wind-resistant structure capable of withstanding 210 mph winds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If reinforced end walls and arch panel roofs are added to improve wind resistance, then structural strength increases, but device complexity and assembly time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewind resistanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement elements are segmented into discrete, pre-fabricated components rather than monolithic structures. End walls are divided into modular panels with standardized connection points, and the arch roof is segmented into panel sections. This segmentation reduces complexity by enabling standardized assembly procedures while maintaining the wind resistance of continuous reinforced structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement is applied locally at critical stress points rather than uniformly across the entire structure. The end walls and roof arches receive concentrated reinforcement where wind loads are greatest, while other areas maintain the simpler container configuration. This localized approach achieves necessary wind resistance with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9725895B1Relocatable wind resistant modular ISO container structure
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 KWIKSPACE GUAM
  • US9725895B1 patent drawing
  • US9725895B1 patent drawing
  • US9725895B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A relocateable wind resistant modular ISO container structure preferably includes a plurality of ISO containers, two modular end walls and a modular roof. An upper ISO container is secured to a lower ISO container with a plurality of twist lock connectors and a plurality of container bridge fittings to form a plurality of ISO blocks. The modular roof includes a plurality of arch panels and a plurality of arch connectors. The plurality of arch panels are attached to each other with fasteners to form a roof panel. The plurality of arch connectors are attached to opposing ends of the roof panel to form a modular roof. A gutter may be secured to opposing ends of the modular roof. The end wall is retained between the first and second ISO blocks. The end wall is preferably fabricated from a metal corrugated panel or a reinforced metal panel.