Modular Learning Facility Management System for Microlearning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modular learning systems face difficulties in managing microlearning facilities due to differences in structure and management compared to conventional educational institutions, making it challenging to enable educational administrators to effectively manage these facilities.

Innovation Solution

A modular learning system is developed with a modular learning facility management module that includes various databases and modules such as purchase analytics, performance analytics, access control, and ergonomic compatibility, allowing for the setup and management of learning facilities and access control, enabling users to purchase and perform learning applications in micro increments of time and money.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional educational institution management structures are used, then institutional stability and accreditation compliance are maintained, but the system cannot effectively manage microlearning facilities with different structures and requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage microlearning facilitiesVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the learning management system into distinct modular components: institutional management modules for conventional institutions and microlearning facility management modules for microlearning facilities. Each module is independently designed to handle specific facility types, allowing the system to adapt to different structures without requiring complete system redesign. This segmentation enables administrators to selectively activate appropriate management modules based on facility type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal management platform that can handle both conventional educational institutions and microlearning facilities through a common interface and centralized control mechanism. The system provides multi-functional capabilities including student enrollment, faculty management, curriculum delivery, and facility access control that work across different institution types, reducing the need for separate management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If access is restricted to employed tutors and admitted students only, then institutional security and resource protection are maintained, but flexibility and accessibility for external users are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess flexibilityVSAvoidfacility access control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic access control mechanisms that adjust permissions based on user roles, facility types, and specific learning applications. The system can dynamically grant temporary access to external users for specific microlearning facilities while maintaining restricted access to core institutional resources. Access rights are automatically adjusted based on enrollment status, appointment schedules, and facility availability, providing flexibility without compromising security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary access management layer that mediates between external users and institutional resources. This intermediary system verifies user credentials, checks facility availability, and grants appropriate access levels without requiring direct integration with core institutional databases. The mediator maintains security protocols while enabling flexible access for tutors, students, and external users across different facility types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If learning facilities are managed as integrated conventional institutions, then comprehensive resource utilization is achieved, but the unique requirements of microlearning facilities are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility type specificityVSAvoidmanagement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments facility management into specialized modules that understand the unique requirements of microlearning facilities, such as short-term booking, rapid setup/teardown, and flexible scheduling. Each facility type has dedicated management protocols that optimize operations for its specific needs while maintaining integration with the broader institutional system. This segmentation allows microlearning facilities to operate efficiently without being constrained by conventional institution management procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality management where each facility type receives customized management protocols and资源配置 based on its specific requirements. Microlearning facilities receive specialized attention for rapid deployment, while conventional classrooms receive traditional long-term planning. The system automatically adjusts management parameters, scheduling algorithms, and resource allocation strategies according to the local characteristics of each facility type, improving overall management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10235727B2Learning facility management in a modular learning system
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 MONK AKARSHALA
  • US10235727B2 patent drawing
  • US10235727B2 patent drawing
  • US10235727B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are disclosed for managing learning facilities in a modular learning system. Information about a plurality of learning facilities, each associated with learning infrastructure, is stored in the modular learning system. Learning applications are also stored in the modular learning system, with each learning application associated with ergonomic requirements. The modular learning system receives a request to set up a learning facility for at least one learning application, and based on the infrastructure and ergonomic requirements determines whether the facility and the at least one learning application are compatible.