Modular Lifting Sling System with Universal Master Link

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lifting sling systems are inefficient and pose safety risks due to heavy manual handling, incorrect Working Load Limit (WLL) information, and suboptimal crane utilization, especially with multi-leg slings, leading to potential overloading and accidents.

Innovation Solution

A lifting sling system with a reduced number of interchangeable units, each with different chain sizes, allowing for flexible combinations of single and dual leg configurations, and an information carrier system providing clear WLL data for various permissible combinations, ensuring optimal crane capacity utilization and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate lifting sling units with one, two, three and four legs are equipped for different loads, then proper and secure lifting can be achieved for different kinds of loads, but the device complexity and quantity of equipment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capability for different loadsVSAvoidnumber of separate sling units
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting sling unit is designed with a master link that can accommodate coupling members for different numbers of legs (1, 2, 3, or 4 legs) through a universal interface. This allows a single sling unit to perform multiple functions by simply changing the number of coupling members attached, eliminating the need for separate sling units for each leg configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The lifting sling unit is divided into separable components: a master link, multiple coupling members, and chain legs. These parts can be assembled and disassembled independently, allowing the operator to configure the sling with the appropriate number of legs for each specific lifting task, thereby reducing the need to store multiple complete sling units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If multi-leg lifting sling units are used, then lifting capacity is increased, but the weight of the equipment increases making manual handling difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidweight of sling unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sling unit is designed with dynamic configurability, allowing the number of legs to be adjusted based on the lifting task requirements. Operators can assemble only the necessary number of legs and coupling members needed for each specific lift, rather than always deploying a heavy multi-leg configuration, thereby reducing the weight that must be manually handled while maintaining high lifting capacity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If all legs are assumed to carry equal load, then WLL calculation is simplified, but safety risks arise when legs do not carry equal load

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveWLL calculation methodVSAvoidsafety of lifting operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates an information carrier (such as a tag or label) attached to the master link that provides WLL information based on the actual number of legs being used and their configuration. This feedback mechanism ensures that the WLL displayed reflects the real loading conditions, alerting operators to adjust the load or configuration if equal load distribution cannot be achieved, thereby maintaining safety without overly complicating the calculation method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If a reduced number of interchangeable sling units are used, then equipment quantity and handling complexity is reduced, but flexibility for different load configurations may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sling unitsVSAvoidconfiguration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting sling unit is divided into separable components: a master link, multiple coupling members, and chain legs. These parts can be assembled and disassembled independently, allowing the operator to configure the sling with the appropriate number of legs for each specific lifting task, thereby reducing the need to store multiple complete sling units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lifting sling unit is designed with a master link that can accommodate coupling members for different numbers of legs (1, 2, 3, or 4 legs) through a universal interface. This allows a single sling unit to perform multiple functions by simply changing the number of coupling members attached, eliminating the need for separate sling units for each leg configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2137092B1Lifting sling system
Publication Date: 2015.06.10 FRENOLINK FORVALTNINGS
  • EP2137092B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2137092B1 patent drawingFigure 2~2a
  • EP2137092B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is disclosed a lifting sling system for connecting various loads to a lifting apparatus with a lifting hook (1), comprising a limited number of combinable lifting sling units (10, 20), each consisting of a number of pre-assembled parts (11, 12, 13; 21, 22, 23), with at least two and no more than four different sling sizes in certain combinations, so as to fully utilize the load capacity of the lifting apparatus.