Modular Load-Carrying System with Segmented Support Panel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Backpacks and body armor systems often cause discomfort and back injuries due to uneven weight distribution, as existing frames restrict movement and are not adapted for simultaneous use, leading to significant health and logistical issues for military and outdoor personnel.

Innovation Solution

A modular load-carrying system featuring a waist belt with a support panel that distributes the weight of both backpacks and body armor to the hips, allowing for interchangeable components and independent movement, using materials like aramid fibers and resins for ballistic protection and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a backpack frame is used to support and stabilize large loads, then load-bearing capacity and stability are improved, but user movement freedom is restricted due to coupling with waist belt

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoiduser movement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into separate segments: upper back panel, lower back panel, and waist belt, connected by flexible linkages. This segmentation allows each component to move independently, maintaining load-bearing capacity while enabling greater user movement freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame incorporates dynamic elements including flexible linkages, articulation points, and adjustable connections that allow the structure to adapt and move with the user's body motions. This dynamic design maintains structural integrity under load while permitting natural movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If a substantial frame and waist belt are used for multi-day backpacking, then load distribution and stability are improved, but system weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload distributionVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame system is segmented into separate components (upper panel, lower panel, waist belt, leg straps) that can be independently adjusted and optimized for weight. This allows selective use of frame components based on specific mission requirements, reducing unnecessary weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame includes adjustable and collapsible elements that allow the structure to be configured according to load requirements. When heavy loads are carried, the full frame structure is engaged; when loads are lighter, components can be adjusted or removed to reduce weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If body armor and backpack are worn simultaneously with separate support systems, then ballistic protection is provided, but weight distribution becomes uneven and discomfort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic protectionVSAvoidcomfort and weight distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The body armor and backpack are integrated into a unified load-carrying system where the frame structure serves as a common support platform for both components. The waist belt and back panels provide shared structural support, consolidating weight-bearing functions and improving overall comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides ballistic protection mounting, load-bearing support, weight distribution, and stability. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate support systems and optimizes overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If backpack frames are adapted for body armor use, then versatility is improved, but frame complexity and design constraints increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterchangeabilityVSAvoidframe design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is designed as a universal platform with standardized attachment points and interfaces that can accommodate both body armor and various backpack configurations. This universal design enables interchangeability without requiring multiple specialized frame designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame is divided into modular components with standardized connection interfaces, allowing different configurations for body armor or backpack use. This modular approach maintains versatility while managing design complexity through component standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8997262B2Personal load-carrying system
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 KLEIN PHILLIP ALEX
  • US8997262B2 patent drawing
  • US8997262B2 patent drawing
  • US8997262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Personal load-carrying systems are described. Embodiments include a waist belt having a pocket within which a support panel sets. An upper portion of the support panel resides in a sleeve coupled to a backpack or ballistic garment. The support panel thus supports some of the weight of the backpack or ballistic garment and transfers the load to the waist belt. Embodiments include personal load-carrying systems in which a backpack and ballistic garment use the same waist belt and support panel, and are interchangeable thereupon. Variations include personal load-carrying systems in which a ballistic garment and backpack are worn simultaneously.