Modular Locking Strip for Digital Device Chassis Security Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital device securing solutions are inflexible, requiring users to purchase new chassis when security needs change, leading to high costs for manufacturers due to the need for a range of chassis types to accommodate varying user requirements.

Innovation Solution

A modular locking strip that can be assembled on existing chassis, featuring assembly means, retaining means, and a locking unit with a movable locking lug, allowing for adjustable security levels without replacing the chassis, and compatibility with standard locking slots like Kensingtonā„¢.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional key and lock system is used to secure the digital device in the chassis, then the security level is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase due to needing multiple chassis types for different security needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity levelVSAvoidchassis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is segmented into a reusable locking strip component that can be attached to and removed from the chassis. This allows the security mechanism to be separated from the base chassis structure, enabling a single chassis design to support multiple security levels by simply adding or removing the locking strip rather than manufacturing different chassis types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking strip serves multiple functions: it provides the locking mechanism, houses the retaining means for the digital device, and offers assembly means for attachment to the chassis. This multi-functional design consolidates what would otherwise require separate components, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining security functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of chassis are manufactured to accommodate different security requirements, then the adaptability to user needs is improved, but the manufacturing cost and complexity for the manufacturer increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to security needsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static chassis design to a dynamic configuration where the security level can be changed by attaching or removing the locking strip. This dynamic approach allows the same chassis to adapt to different security requirements without requiring multiple chassis variants, thereby reducing manufacturing costs and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The security parameter of the system is made adjustable through the addition or removal of the locking strip, rather than requiring changes to the fundamental chassis structure. This parameter change approach allows flexible adaptation to different security needs while maintaining a standardized chassis design for mass production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a fixed chassis design is used, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the adaptability to changing user security needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidadaptability to security needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the locking mechanism into a separate, attachable locking strip component, the system enables a fixed, standardized chassis design to provide variable security levels. Users can adapt the fixed chassis to changing needs by adding or removing the locking strip, combining manufacturing efficiency with flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a locking strip is added to enhance security, then the security level is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity levelVSAvoidlocking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism, retaining means, and assembly means are merged into a single integrated locking strip component. This consolidation reduces the number of separate parts and interfaces that would otherwise be required, thereby enhancing security without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking strip is designed as a multi-functional component that combines the locking mechanism, device retaining features, and chassis attachment means. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components, thereby improving security while minimizing the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3363973B1Locking mechanism for a digital device in a chassis
Publication Date: 2021.11.03 BANKS & ACQUIRERS INT HLDG SAS
  • EP3363973B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3363973B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3363973B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5a

AI summary

The invention relates to a locking strip (1) intended to lock a digital device previously inserted into a chassis (2). The locking strip (1) comprises an internal face for receiving at least a portion of the digital device and an external face known as the locking face. According to the invention, such a locking strip (1) further comprises assembly means (11) on said frame, retaining means (12) of said digital device, and at least one locking unit (13), said locking unit comprising locking means (131, 132) of the strip to said frame.