Modular Machine Recovery With Autonomous Module Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial machines in factories face significant downtime due to system failures, which can lead to manufacturing delays and inefficiencies, especially when proactive replacement of components leads to wastage and unexpected failures still occur.

Innovation Solution

Implementing autonomous vehicles to autonomously recover industrial machines by identifying faulty modules and replacing them with functional ones, minimizing downtime through hot-swappable modules and efficient repair processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If proactive replacement of system components is implemented, then machine reliability is improved, but manufacturing productivity deteriorates due to unnecessary downtime and component wastage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostics and identifies components that actually need replacement before scheduling maintenance. This prevents premature replacement of still-functional components, reducing unnecessary downtime and component wastage while maintaining machine reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle performs self-diagnosis and self-replacement of modules. The system monitors its own status, identifies faulty modules, and autonomously replaces them without human intervention, optimizing the balance between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If traditional manual module replacement is used, then manufacturing productivity is maintained through continuous operation, but machine downtime increases significantly due to troubleshooting and manual replacement time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidmachine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with an autonomous vehicle equipped with robotic manipulators. The autonomous vehicle automatically identifies, removes, and installs modules, eliminating the time required for manual troubleshooting and replacement while maintaining continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle acts as an intermediary between the faulty module and the replacement module. It autonomously navigates to the machine, identifies the faulty module through sensors, removes it, and installs a replacement module from storage, significantly reducing downtime compared to manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If modular architecture with hot-swappable modules is implemented, then machine downtime is reduced to replacement time only, but device complexity increases due to modular design requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine downtimeVSAvoidmodular design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the machine into independent, hot-swappable modules that can be replaced individually without shutting down the entire machine. Each module is self-contained with standardized interfaces, enabling quick replacement by the autonomous vehicle while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design uses standardized interfaces and universal mounting mechanisms that work across different module types. This universality simplifies the replacement process despite the increased modular complexity, as the autonomous vehicle uses the same manipulation techniques for all module types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If autonomous vehicles are deployed for module replacement, then manufacturing efficiency is enhanced through minimized downtime, but device complexity increases due to autonomous navigation and module identification systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidautonomous system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle uses sensors to continuously monitor the machine's status and identify faulty modules. The system receives feedback from the machine's control system about module health, navigates autonomously based on this information, and confirms successful replacement, optimizing manufacturing efficiency despite the added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle performs self-navigation, self-identification of faulty modules, and self-execution of replacement operations. This self-service capability enhances manufacturing efficiency by operating autonomously without human intervention, managing the complexity through integrated sensor and control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12372947B2Modular systems for industrial machinery
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12372947B2 patent drawing
  • US12372947B2 patent drawing
  • US12372947B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for autonomously recovering a machine comprising one or more modules. An error message from the machine is received and, based on the error message, a first module of the one or more modules to replace is determined, wherein the first module has a first type. An autonomous vehicle is instructed to remove, from the machine, the first module. The autonomous vehicle is instructed to install, at the machine, a second module of the first type.