Modular Man-Portable Aircraft Rapid In-Situ Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft systems face challenges in transitioning efficiently between vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) and wing-borne lift orientations, particularly in achieving rapid assembly and maintaining hover stability in diverse flight attitudes, which limits their versatility and operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A man-portable aircraft system with modular components, including wings, pylons, and propulsion assemblies, that can rapidly assemble and disassemble using high-speed fastening elements and electromagnetic connections, enabling transition between VTOL and biplane orientations, and featuring a distributed thrust array and advanced flight control systems for autonomous or remote operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If aircraft systems use traditional assembly methods, then structural integrity is maintained, but assembly time is excessive and operational efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into modular components (wings, fuselage, propulsion assemblies, control surfaces) that can be independently manufactured, transported, and rapidly assembled. Each module contains standardized connection interfaces that enable quick coupling and decoupling without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Connection features such as fastening elements, alignment pins, and locking mechanisms are pre-installed on aircraft components during manufacturing. This preliminary preparation allows for rapid in-situ assembly by eliminating the need for complex on-site fabrication or adjustment of connection hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If aircraft use fixed configuration, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different missions and orientations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientation transition capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft incorporates movable and reconfigurable components including adjustable wings, movable propulsion assemblies, and repositionable control surfaces. These dynamic elements allow the aircraft to transition between different orientations (VTOL, hover, forward flight) and configurations based on mission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft is designed with universal connection interfaces and standardized mounting points that allow the same basic airframe to perform multiple functions across different flight regimes. The modular propulsion assemblies can be repositioned or reconfigured to enable both vertical takeoff/landing and conventional wing-borne flight modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If rapid assembly features are implemented, then assembly speed is improved, but connection reliability and structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system incorporates electromagnetic fastening elements and magnetic coupling mechanisms that provide rapid, tool-free assembly while maintaining structural integrity. These electromagnetic connections can be engaged and disengaged quickly through electrical actuation while providing connection strengths comparable to traditional mechanical fastening systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of time

If modular components with rapid connection features are used, then assembly time is reduced, but the number of connection points and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly timeVSAvoidconnection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple connection functions (mechanical attachment, electrical connectivity, alignment, and locking) are merged into integrated connection assemblies. Each modular interface combines these functions into a single coupling action, reducing the number of separate steps and components needed while maintaining connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10604249B2Man portable aircraft system for rapid in-situ assembly
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10604249B2 patent drawing
  • US10604249B2 patent drawing
  • US10604249B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A man portable aircraft system includes first and second wings with first and second pylons couplable between pylon stations thereof to form an airframe. Each of a plurality of propulsion assemblies is couplable to one of a plurality of nacelle stations of the wings to form a two-dimensional distributed thrust array. A flight control system is couplable to the airframe and is operable to independently control each of the propulsion assemblies. A payload is couplable between payload stations of the first and second pylons. A man portable container is operable to receive the wings, pylons, propulsion assemblies, flight control system and payload in a disassembled configuration. The connections between the wings, pylons, propulsion assemblies and payload are operable for rapid in-situ assembly. In an assembled configuration, the aircraft is operable to transition between thrust-borne lift in a VTOL orientation and wing-borne lift in a biplane orientation.