Modular Manifold for 3D Printing Element Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial inkjet printing elements, such as the Q-Series, are vulnerable to corrosion and mechanical shock due to their fragile materials and exposed electronics, and lack effective protection against contamination and leaks in aggressive environments like powder-substrate 3D printing.

Innovation Solution

A modular manifold with a simple geometric shape, preferably made from chemically resistant plastics like polypropylene or PVDF, is designed to protect the printing elements with gaskets, fluid fittings, and electrical connections, allowing for customizable orientations and enhanced protection against contamination and mechanical stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If printing elements are made from fragile materials like graphite and glass, then printing precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to susceptibility to corrosion and mechanical shock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting precisionVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into a robust housing structure and separate printing element components. The housing contains corrosive environments away from sensitive electronics and materials, while printing elements can be replaced without replacing the entire apparatus. This segmentation allows fragile printing elements to maintain precision while the robust housing ensures reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A protective housing structure acts as an intermediary between the aggressive printing environment and the fragile printing elements. The housing includes fluid channels and mounting structures that mediate the interaction between corrosive materials and sensitive components, protecting them while maintaining printing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If electronics and circuit board traces are exposed, then ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to susceptibility to contamination and corrosion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Electronics and circuit board traces are nested within the protective housing structure rather than being exposed on the exterior. The housing contains a cavity that accommodates electronic components, protecting them from contamination and corrosion while maintaining ease of manufacture through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing structure serves as an intermediary barrier between corrosive printing materials and exposed electronics. It provides sealed fluid channels and protected mounting locations for circuit boards, preventing contamination while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If fluid channels have simple inlet geometries, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to lack of protection against leaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The housing incorporates gaskets and sealed fluid channels that prevent leaks while maintaining simple inlet geometries. The gaskets create flexible seals between the housing and printing elements, preventing contamination without adding complex valve or pump mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Reliability

If printing elements are protected from corrosion and mechanical shock, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional protective structures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Protective functions are merged into the housing structure itself rather than being separate additions. The housing simultaneously provides mechanical protection, corrosion resistance, fluid channeling, and electronic component mounting, improving reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing structure performs multiple functions: it protects fragile printing elements from corrosion and mechanical shock, contains and directs fluid flow through sealed channels, provides mounting structures for electronics, and offers replaceability of printing elements. This multi-functionality improves reliability without adding separate protective systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3283298B1Modular printing apparatus for 3D printing
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 3DBOTICS INC
  • EP3283298B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3283298B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3283298B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A printing apparatus including a manifold shaped as a rectangular parallelepiped having three pairs of parallel faces and including (i) a body thereof defining a plurality of fluidic channels, (ii) a bottom portion thereof defining a slot configured to accommodate insertion of a printing element; and (iii) at least one face defining a plurality of fluidic connections in fluidic communication with the fluidic channels. A method for manufacturing a printing apparatus includes the steps of a) manufacturing a manifold by manufacturing a parallelepiped and defining a slot therein configured to hold a printing element; b) machining features into the manifold for mechanical mounting, electronic connection, and fluid connection; and (c) assembling the manifold with the printing element and a gasket to form the printing apparatus.