Modular Marine Structures Using Segmented Polymer Blocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for constructing large, scalable marine infrastructure are costly, inflexible, and prone to mechanical stresses due to the use of heavy, rigid structures that are difficult to deploy and dismantle, especially in water environments where wave and tidal forces are prevalent.

Innovation Solution

A modular structure composed of lightweight polymer elements with protruding and receiving parts, allowing for assembly and connection to form complex shapes, combined with flexible strengthening elements that provide structural integrity and buoyancy control, enabling the creation of buoyant structures that can be easily assembled and adapted in situ.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If heavy structures with high inherent strength are used, then structural integrity is improved, but ease of deployment and dismantlement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidease of deployment
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into modular building blocks that can be independently manufactured, transported, and assembled. Each block contains internal strengthening elements and interlocking features, allowing the overall structure to achieve high strength through modular assembly rather than requiring single-piece heavy construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Strengthening elements are nested within the building blocks themselves, with channels and cavities integrated into the block geometry. This allows strengthening components to be incorporated without increasing external dimensions, maintaining compactness while enhancing structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Strength

If traditional materials such as masonry, reinforced concrete and high strength steel are used, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability and ease of modification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure consists of discrete, standardized building blocks that can be easily added, removed, or reconfigured. This modular approach enables adaptability and modification without requiring demolition or complex construction operations, unlike traditional monolithic structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure is designed to be dynamic and reconfigurable rather than static and fixed. Building blocks can be relocated and reassembled to adapt to changing requirements, allowing the structure to evolve over time while maintaining structural strength through standardized connection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If structures are designed to be rigid and unyielding, then structural stability is improved, but resistance to wave and tidal forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmechanical stresses from waves
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The modular structure allows for controlled flexibility and movement in response to environmental forces. The interlocking building blocks can accommodate slight displacements and rotations, enabling the structure to flex with wave and tidal forces rather than resisting them rigidly, thereby reducing stress concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The segmented modular design allows different parts of the structure to move independently in response to localized forces, distributing mechanical stresses across multiple blocks rather than concentrating them in a single rigid framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If wet construction methods with mortar or cement are used, then structural integrity is improved, but construction time and labor intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Chemical bonding methods (mortar and cement) are replaced with mechanical interlocking systems. Building blocks feature integrated protrusions and recesses that provide snap-fit or friction-based connections, eliminating the need for wet construction processes and allowing rapid assembly without curing times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The structure is pre-fabricated as discrete modular units with built-in connection features. This allows blocks to be assembled dry-stack style similar to LEGO bricks, dramatically reducing construction time and labor compared to traditional wet methods that require skilled masons and extended curing periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces construction costs, enhances design flexibility, and allows for structures that can withstand mechanical stresses, such as waves and currents, while maintaining structural integrity and scalability, making it feasible to build large, submerged tanks and platforms efficiently.

Implementation Method 1

The present invention relates in general to modular structures at least partly submerged in water... a modular structure for being at least partly submerged in a body of water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentEP3541998B1Modular structures and method for construction thereof
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 GUDESEN HANS GUDE
  • EP3541998B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3541998B1 patent drawingFigure 1c
  • EP3541998B1 patent drawingFigure 1d

AI summary

A modular structure for being at least partly submerged in a body of water, is disclosed. The modular structure comprises structure elements and strengthening elements providing structural integrity and flexibility, and can typically be a closed structure like e.g. a tank structure. Further, macro structures comprising attached modular structures are presented. Finally, methods for construction of such structures are disclosed.