Mattress foundations, kits and related methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional mattress foundations often compromise on stability when assembled by consumers, as quick and easy assembly typically requires pre-assembling parts, increasing packaging complexity and shipping costs, while sacrificing stability, and may result in a swaying frame shape during movement or relocation.

Innovation Solution

A mattress foundation kit comprising side rails, end rails, and slats with varying lengths and angles, along with corner stabilizers and flexible connections, allows for easy assembly and increased stability by overlapping rail sections and using angle-adjustable slats, which are packaged in a parallel orientation for shipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the foundation is pre-assembled to ensure stability, then stability is improved, but packaging complexity and shipping costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoundation stabilityVSAvoidpackaging complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foundation is divided into separate modular components (side rails, end rails, slats, corner blocks) that can be packaged separately and assembled by the consumer. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for compact packaging while maintaining the ability to form a stable complete structure when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Corner blocks are pre-configured with recesses and fastening mechanisms that guide the assembly process. The rails are designed with predetermined positioning features that align during assembly, reducing the need for complex packaging while ensuring proper assembly sequence and foundation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If the foundation is pre-assembled to ensure stability, then stability is improved, but assembly time and tools required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoundation stabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The corner blocks are designed to self-align and self-secure the rails through recesses that guide placement and built-in fastening mechanisms that automatically secure components together. This self-service design eliminates the need for complex assembly tools and reduces assembly time while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Corner blocks serve as intermediary components that mediate the connection between side rails and end rails. These corner blocks provide a simplified interface that guides the assembly process and secures the framework, reducing the complexity and time required for direct rail-to-rail connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If fewer tools are used for assembly to reduce complexity, then ease of assembly is improved, but foundation stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidfoundation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The corner blocks incorporate built-in fastening mechanisms that automatically secure the rails without requiring external tools. The recesses and positioning features guide the assembly process while the integrated fastening system ensures stable connections, achieving both ease of assembly and foundation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The corner blocks merge multiple functions into a single component: they provide structural connection points, guide rail positioning, and incorporate fastening mechanisms. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate tools while ensuring stable connections through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If slats are positioned non-perpendicularly at angles of 25° to 35°, then mattress support is improved, but assembly precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemattress supportVSAvoidslat positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The slat positioning features are designed with local quality variations at specific locations along the rails. The rails include positioning features at predetermined intervals that guide slats at the required 25° to 35° angles, ensuring proper orientation without requiring high precision throughout the entire assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rails are pre-configured with positioning features and guide elements that establish the correct slat angles before slat installation. This preliminary preparation ensures that slats are positioned at the precise 25° to 35° angles required for optimal mattress support, reducing the precision requirements during the actual slat installation step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10687630B1Mattress foundations, kits and related methods
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 SE BOARD NC LLC
  • US10687630B1 patent drawing
  • US10687630B1 patent drawing
  • US10687630B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Mattress foundations and foundation corners, methods, and kits include a first side rail, a second side rail, a first end rail, and a second end rail. In one example, the rails join at corners to form the frame of the foundation and the rails may include at least a partial overlap between the rail the corners. The foundations and kits further include a plurality of slats. The slats may be of varying lengths. The invention may further include a method of assembling a foundation kit.