Modular Metal Block Forging with Hourglass Module Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing large metal blocks are unreliable and inefficient, particularly for forgings over hundred tons, as they require high equipment standards and result in significant losses when weld joints fail, making one-time construction forming difficult and costly.

Innovation Solution

A modular metal construction forming method involving prefabricated blanks welded in pairs within a vacuum chamber, followed by upsetting deformation and heat preservation, repeated to form hourglass-shaped modules that are then further processed to create larger modules, allowing for controlled deformation and reduced surface tensile stress, ultimately forming a large metal block.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If one-time construction forming method is used for large metal blocks, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to high equipment requirements and huge losses when weld joints fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large metal block construction into multiple modules (first modules, second modules, intermediate modules) that can be manufactured separately and then assembled. This segmentation allows each module to be produced with controlled requirements, reducing equipment constraints and enabling quality verification at each stage, thereby improving reliability while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional forging method is used for large forgings, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to extremely difficult one-time construction forming for hundred-ton forgings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The construction process is divided into modular units that can be manufactured independently using conventional forging methods, then assembled through welding. This approach maintains the simplicity of conventional methods while improving productivity by allowing parallel manufacturing of multiple modules and reducing the burden on single equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prepares prefabricated blanks and modules in advance before final assembly. These pre-fabricated components can be manufactured, inspected, and prepared simultaneously, then assembled in a coordinated sequence, thereby improving overall productivity without complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If hourglass-shaped modules are used in construction, then manufacturing cost is reduced due to reduced pressure requirements, but device complexity increases due to specific shape requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs hourglass-shaped modules with asymmetric geometry that concentrates deformation at the interface positions during upsetting. This asymmetric design optimizes the stress distribution, reducing the peak pressure requirements and manufacturing costs, while the shape is achieved through standard forging processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The hourglass shape creates localized deformation zones at the interface positions of the modules. By concentrating the deformation in specific local areas rather than uniformly across the entire component, the required pressure is reduced, lowering manufacturing costs while the shape is formed using conventional forging equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If multiple modules are assembled through welding, then reliability is improved through quality control of each module, but loss of time increases due to repeated welding and assembly operations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidconstruction period
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares multiple modules and prefabricated blanks in advance before final assembly. These modules can be manufactured, inspected, and prepared simultaneously in parallel, then assembled in a coordinated sequence. This preliminary preparation reduces the actual assembly time and minimizes the impact of welding operations on the overall construction period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the reliability and efficiency of large metal block production by allowing for quality control of each module, reducing production time, and minimizing pressure requirements, thereby increasing yield and reducing production costs while avoiding surface tensile stress.

Implementation Method 1

vacuum electron beam welding is conducted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam welding: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 2

within a vacuum chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

high-temperature diffusion bonding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion bonding: Diffusion Welding

Implementation Method 4

heating temperature is not less than 1200°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Implementation Method 5

upsetting deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUpsetting deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 6

height reduction of implementing upsetting deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3683006B1Forming method for modular metal construction
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 CHINA INSTITUTE OF ATOMIC ENERGY
  • EP3683006B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3683006B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2h
  • EP3683006B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(i)

AI summary

The invention relates to a forming method for modular metal construction. According to the method, prefabricated blanks of large forgings are divided into multilevel modules to perform construction respectively based on the specification conditions, and a blank is finally prepared and is processed into a component or a part. The method is more reliable and controllable in construction quality. Each module can be subjected to flaw detection after being forged, so that the fact that the modules can be used after being qualified is guaranteed; and multiple pieces can be put into production, so that the construction period can be effectively guaranteed. The method can improve the yield of large metal construction forming.