Modular Micro-reactor with Flange Frames and Tensioning Means

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current continuous reaction micro-reactor technologies are challenging to design and simulate effectively, requiring supplemental experimental studies to understand fluid dynamics and scale up from laboratory to industrial sizes, limiting the depth of research and adaptability for various chemical reactions.

Innovation Solution

A modular continuous reaction micro-reactor with a process fluid channel system and heat exchange system, where the reaction unit is encased by flange-like frames and tensioning means, allowing for easy exchange of components and optimal temperature control, enabling in situ observation and adaptation for different chemical reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a continuous reaction micro-reactor is designed with a process fluid channel system and heat exchange system, then the temperature regime for chemical reactions can be controlled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature regime controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the process fluid channel system and heat exchange fluid channel system into a single reaction unit structure. The heat exchange channels are integrated within the same module as the process channels, allowing thermal management to be incorporated without adding separate external heating/cooling apparatus, thus controlling temperature while managing device complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the reaction unit is made modular with exchangeable components, then the adaptability for different chemical reactions is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability for different chemical reactionsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction unit is divided into modular components including the process fluid channel system, heat exchange fluid channel system, and frame means that can be independently assembled and disassembled. This segmentation allows different reaction units to be exchanged for different chemical reactions while using standardized frame means and tensioning means, achieving adaptability without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame means and tensioning means are designed as universal components that can accommodate different reaction units for various chemical reactions. The standardized flange interfaces and mounting structures allow the same frame assembly to hold different process modules, heat exchange modules, or both combined, providing multi-functionality that enhances adaptability while controlling complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the first and second frame means are pressed together by tensioning means, then the mechanical protection and sealing of the reaction unit is improved, but the ease of operation for component exchange deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical protection and sealingVSAvoidease of operation for component exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tensioning means are designed to be dynamically adjustable, allowing the frame means to be easily assembled and disassembled by adjusting the tensioning force. During operation, the tensioning means maintain sufficient compression for sealing and mechanical protection, but can be quickly released when component exchange is needed, thus achieving both reliability and ease of operation through dynamic control of the fastening mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular design facilitates deeper understanding of fluid dynamics, enhances research capabilities, and allows for scalable and adaptable chemical reaction processes, improving the efficiency and flexibility of continuous reaction technology.

Implementation Method 1

a heat exchange fluid channel system for adjusting the temperature environment of the process fluid channel system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of feeds or reactants continuously flowing into a reactor or micro-reactor chemically interact therein... bringing together, mixing and swirling the plurality of feeds embedded in an optimum reaction environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent flow: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

The process fluid channel system may be divided into at least one turbulent-flow mixing zone and at least one essentially laminar-flow retention zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Data Source

PatentEP2429698A2Continuous reaction micro-reactor
Publication Date: 2012.03.21 LONZA AG

AI summary

A continuous reaction micro - reactor of modular structure comprises, arranged along a back- to- front stacking axis thereof, a first frame means (100), a reaction unit (RU), and a second frame means (200), wherein said reaction unit (RU) comprises a process fluid channel system for continuous reaction of a plurality of feeds or reactants flowing into said reaction unit to form at least one product flowing out of said reaction unit (RU), and a heat exchange fluid channel system for adjusting the temperature environment of said process fluid channel system, said first and second frame means (100, 200) are each formed as a flange, and said first and second frame means are alpressed towards each other by a plurality of tensioning means (200) arranged along and within an outer circumference of said first and second frame means (100, 200) and enclosing said reaction unit (RU).