Modular Machine Learning Threat Detection for Virtualized Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security threat detection and mitigation systems in virtualized computing environments are disjointed, requiring manual responses and lacking scalability, visibility, and flexibility, making them difficult to modify and update.

Innovation Solution

A unified security threat detection and mitigation platform using machine learning techniques to classify network traffic patterns, employing inference engines and a modular design for extensible and scalable threat detection and automated mitigation responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple individual security mechanisms are used for threat detection and mitigation, then security coverage is improved, but system complexity and difficulty of management increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual security mechanisms into a single unified security platform that provides comprehensive threat detection and mitigation. The platform integrates various security functions including network traffic analysis, endpoint protection, and threat response capabilities into one cohesive system, eliminating the need to manage multiple separate security applications while maintaining broad security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified security platform is designed to perform multiple security functions simultaneously, including threat detection, analysis, mitigation, and response. It can handle various types of security threats across different vectors (network, endpoint, application) through a single multi-functional system, reducing complexity while improving comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual responses are required for threat mitigation, then flexibility in handling complex threats is improved, but response time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The security platform pre-configures multiple response actions and mitigation strategies that can be automatically executed when threats are detected. Common threat scenarios have pre-defined response playbooks that automatically implement appropriate countermeasures, enabling rapid response without requiring manual human intervention for each incident while maintaining flexibility through configurable response options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where threat detection triggers automatic response actions, and the results of these actions are monitored and fed back into the system. This allows the platform to dynamically adjust its responses based on real-time threat intelligence and the effectiveness of previous actions, maintaining flexibility while achieving rapid automated response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If a unified security platform is implemented, then scalability and ease of maintenance are improved, but initial system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidinitial system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified security platform is architecturally segmented into modular components that can be independently deployed, configured, and scaled. Each module handles specific security functions, allowing the system to be built incrementally and scaled according to organizational needs. This modular approach reduces initial complexity by allowing phased implementation while maintaining scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The platform is designed with dynamic configuration capabilities that allow it to adapt to different organizational sizes and security requirements. The system can dynamically adjust its resource allocation, enable or disable specific security modules, and scale its analytical capabilities based on the volume of data and threats encountered, making it scalable from small to large deployments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If fragmented security approaches are used, then ease of implementation of individual components is improved, but visibility and scalability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidvisibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The unified security platform consolidates visibility across all security domains into a single centralized view. It aggregates data from network traffic, endpoint devices, applications, and threat intelligence sources, providing comprehensive security visibility in one interface. This eliminates the information silos created by fragmented approaches while maintaining ease of implementation through standardized data collection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12425416B2Threat detection and mitigation in a virtualized computing environment
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12425416B2 patent drawing
  • US12425416B2 patent drawing
  • US12425416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A service provider may deploy a security threat detection and mitigation platform in a multi-tenant virtualization environment that includes pluggable data collection, data analysis, and response components. The data analysis components may apply machine learning techniques to generate (based on training data sets) and refine (based on subsequently received data sets and feedback about the resulting classifications) predictors configured to detect particular types of security threats, such as denial of service attacks, botnets, scans, or remote desktop attacks. A data collection layer may collect, filter, organize, and curate network packet traffic data, network packet header data, or other information emitted by computing instances or applications executing on them, and provide the curated data as streams to the analysis layer. A response layer may automatically take action in response to threat detections (which may be overridden by an administrator) and may store classification data for subsequent analysis, feedback, and predictor refinement.