Modular Motor Drive Communication Subassembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor drive systems face challenges in flexibility and efficiency, particularly in accommodating various motor sizes and ratings, with limitations in programming, configuration, and communication, leading to inefficient use of control platforms and potential security risks due to network connections.

Innovation Solution

A modular motor drive system comprising separable power and control subassemblies with an optional communication subassembly that allows for flexible configuration and communication between the control and power subassemblies, enabling easy programming, reprogramming, and servicing without the need for tools, and providing enhanced communication protocols like HSDSI for improved performance and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single packaged motor drive design is used, then programming and control are integrated, but flexibility for different motor sizes and ratings is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility for different motor sizesVSAvoidintegrated package design
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor drive system is divided into separate power subassembly and control subassembly modules that can be independently selected and configured. The control subassembly can be detached from the power subassembly, allowing the same control module to be used with different power ratings and motor types, thereby increasing versatility without requiring complete redesign for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control subassembly is designed as a universal module that can control different power subassemblies and motor types. By separating control from power conversion, a single control platform can serve multiple functions across different motor sizes and applications, eliminating the need for dedicated control circuits for each motor rating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If all control circuitry is included in the single package, then control is integrated, but programming access and reconfiguration become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming accessVSAvoidunitary package structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control subassembly is extracted as a separate, removable module from the power subassembly. This allows programmers and technicians to easily access, remove, and reconfigure control circuits without dealing with the entire integrated package. The control module can be detached for programming, testing, or replacement while leaving the power subassembly in place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static integrated package to a dynamic reconfigurable architecture where the control subassembly can be easily attached and detached. This dynamic design enables flexible programming access and allows the control module to be swapped or reconfigured based on different operational requirements without permanent integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If network connections are built into the drive, then communication capability is provided, but security risks from external access increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capabilityVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The separable control subassembly acts as an intermediary between the power subassembly and external communication networks. Communication interfaces can be selectively integrated into the control module, which can then be detached and secured when network access is not needed. This intermediary approach maintains communication capability while allowing physical isolation to prevent unauthorized external access to the drive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If control modules are designed for specific motor sizes, then control precision is optimized, but efficiency of control platform usage decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol platform efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control subassembly is designed as a universal platform that can precisely control different power subassemblies and motor types. By separating control logic from power conversion, the same control module with its optimized control algorithms can serve multiple motor sizes and applications, maintaining control precision while significantly improving platform utilization efficiency and reducing the total number of control modules needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2913917B1Modular motor drive communication system
Publication Date: 2019.01.02 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • EP2913917B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2913917B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2913917B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A motor drive system includes a control module and a power module for generating control signals and power signals, respectively, for driving an electric motor. An add-on module or subassembly is physically positionable between the control and power modules, and communicates with the control module to allow for communication with external devices.