Modular Mounting Assembly for Architectural Coverings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing architectural covering mounting assemblies are complex and challenging to install, requiring precise alignment and retention methods, and often result in unacceptable light gaps around the edges of the shade when extended over architectural features.

Innovation Solution

A modular mounting assembly comprising a bracket, a bracket adapter, and an end mount, which allows for easy coupling and decoupling of the shade from the brackets, accommodating various mounting orientations and reducing the light gap by nesting components within each other.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional mounting brackets are used to attach the shade to the support structure, then the shade can be mounted to various architectural features, but the alignment process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting orientation flexibilityVSAvoidalignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting assembly is divided into separate functional components: a mounting bracket that attaches to the support structure, a shade assembly with mounting ears, and retention members. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall alignment process by providing clear interfaces between parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Retention members serve as intermediary elements between the mounting bracket and the shade assembly. These retention members facilitate the connection and alignment process by providing a simple engagement mechanism that reduces the complexity of directly aligning the bracket with the shade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional mounting brackets are used to attach the shade, then the shade can be securely retained, but the installation process becomes challenging and requires exact alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshade retentionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retention members are designed to be movable relative to the mounting bracket, allowing them to be positioned for installation and then secured in a fixed retention position. This dynamic design enables easy installation followed by reliable retention, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting assembly is designed so that the retention members can be easily engaged and disengaged by the user without requiring specialized tools or complex alignment procedures. The self-service design allows users to install and adjust the shade themselves while maintaining secure retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If drive unit components are positioned on the mounting bracket, then the shade can be assisted in extension and retraction, but the light gap increases due to limited width dimension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshade extension assistanceVSAvoidlight gap
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The drive unit components are repositioned from the mounting bracket to the shade assembly itself, utilizing the vertical dimension of the shade rather than the horizontal width. This dimensional change allows the drive unit to assist shade operation without increasing the light gap, as the components no longer occupy space that would reduce the shade's effective width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple different mounting brackets are used to accommodate various shade types and orientations, then all configurations can be supported, but the total number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting configuration coverageVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting bracket is designed with universal features that allow it to accommodate different shade types, sizes, and mounting orientations through a single standardized interface. The retention members and mounting ears are configured to work with various bracket orientations (horizontal, vertical, angled) without requiring different bracket designs, thereby reducing the total number of components while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12234686B2Mounting assembly for an architectural covering
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 HUNTER DOUGLAS INC
  • US12234686B2 patent drawing
  • US12234686B2 patent drawing
  • US12234686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a mounting assembly for mounting an architectural covering to a support structure may include a bracket configured to be coupled to the support structure and a bracket adapter configured to be coupled to the bracket. In addition, the mounting assembly may include an end mount configured to be coupled to both an adjacent end of the covering and the bracket adapter. In accordance with aspects of the present subject matter, the various components of the mounting assembly may be configured or adapted to provide one or more advantages over known mounting assemblies.