Modular Multisensory Simulation Architecture for High-Fidelity Immersion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Multisensory Simulation Systems (MSS) are complex and costly, lacking an economical design that integrates multiple modular components effectively to stimulate various user senses simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

The proposed MSS design includes an Omni-Directional Treadmill (ODT), Gravity Modification System (GMS), Motion and Gesture Tracking System (MTS), Data Analytics System (DAS), and various stimulation systems (visual, auditory, tactile, etc.) integrated into a modular framework for enhanced simulation fidelity and user safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple stimulation systems are integrated to enhance simulation fidelity, then the simulation accuracy improves, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation fidelityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the multisensory simulation functionality into separate modular subsystems: visual stimulation system, auditory stimulation system, tactile stimulation system, atmospheric simulation system, and neurological stimulation system. Each subsystem can be independently designed, implemented, and maintained, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high simulation fidelity through coordinated operation of all modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves as a universal coordinating component that manages multiple stimulation systems simultaneously. It receives input data and distributes appropriate signals to visual, auditory, tactile, atmospheric, and neurological subsystems, enabling a single device to perform multiple functions and reduce overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple stimulation systems are integrated to enhance simulation fidelity, then the simulation accuracy improves, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation fidelityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into separate modular subsystems, each component can be manufactured independently using optimized processes for that specific function. This reduces manufacturing costs compared to building a monolithic system, as each module can be produced more efficiently and replaced or upgraded individually without affecting the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular architecture allows individual stimulation subsystems to be manufactured as cost-effective, potentially disposable units. If one subsystem fails or becomes obsolete, only that specific module needs replacement rather than the entire expensive system, reducing long-term costs and enabling use of more economical manufacturing methods for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If modular components are used to reduce system complexity, then the ease of manufacture improves, but the integration coordination becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller acts as a universal coordination hub that manages all modular subsystems through standardized interfaces. It handles synchronization and coordination of visual, auditory, tactile, atmospheric, and neurological stimulation, reducing integration complexity by providing a single point of control rather than requiring complex peer-to-peer coordination between modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the controller monitors the state and performance of each modular subsystem, adjusting their operation to maintain synchronized multisensory stimulation. This feedback loop simplifies integration by automatically coordinating modules based on real-time system state rather than requiring complex pre-programmed coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250161624A1Immersive multisensory simulation system
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 NEWTON VR LTD
  • US20250161624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250161624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250161624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A Multisensory Simulation System comprises systems including: an Omni-Directional Treadmill (ODT), a Gravity Modification System (GMS), a Motion and gesture Tracking System (MTS), a Data Analytics System (DAS), a Visual Stimulation System (VSS), an Auditory Stimulation System (AUSS), an Operator Interface System (OIS), a User Harness System (UHS), a Tactile Stimulation System (TSS), an Atmospheric Simulation System (ATSS), a Neurological Stimulation System (NSS), an Olfactory Stimulation System (OSS), a Gustatory System Stimulation System (GSS), a User Monitoring System (UMS), a Controller, a Game Engine System (GES), database, a Communication Unit (CU), a User Safety System (USS), and a communication bus.