Modular Network Node Control for Earlier I/O Output Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In Distributed Control Systems (DCS), large-capacity control nodes often execute control loops with fixed periods that are not perfectly aligned with the process control time-constants, leading to reduced control quality due to delayed transmission of control outputs to I/O modules and field devices, which can be costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A modular network node system with a control module and SSIO/UIO modules that allow for flexible I/O type selection and time-strobe synchronization, enabling earlier transmission of control outputs and improved alignment with process control time-constants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed period control is used in large-capacity control nodes, then control loops can be executed at consistent intervals, but control quality is reduced due to misalignment with process control time-constants and delayed transmission of control outputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol execution consistencyVSAvoidcontrol quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control node transitions from fixed periodic control to dynamic event-driven control, where control execution is triggered by process events rather than predetermined time intervals. This allows the control system to adapt its response timing to match actual process conditions and time-constants, improving control quality while maintaining execution consistency through systematic event handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameter of control execution from time-based (fixed periods) to event-based triggering. By monitoring process variables and triggering control actions based on event conditions rather than fixed time intervals, the system achieves better alignment with process dynamics and eliminates the delay inherent in fixed-period architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If control nodes are filled to near capacity to maximize cost effectiveness, then resource utilization is optimized, but control outputs are delayed until near the end of the control cycle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol output transmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares control outputs in advance by continuously monitoring process variables and pre-calculating control actions when event conditions are met. This preliminary action allows control outputs to be ready for immediate transmission when triggered, eliminating the delay that occurs in near-capacity fixed-period systems where outputs must wait until the next scheduled execution cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control node autonomously manages its own execution schedule by detecting process events and self-triggering control actions without waiting for external timing signals. This self-service mechanism allows the system to maintain high resource utilization while eliminating transmission delays, as each control node independently responds to process conditions in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If fixed period control execution is used, then control cycles are simplified and easier to manage, but the system cannot precisely align with varying process control time-constants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol cycle managementVSAvoidalignment with process time-constants
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The event-driven control architecture provides a universal framework that can handle multiple different process time-constants and control requirements within a single system. By using event triggers rather than fixed periods, the system can adapt to varying process dynamics across different control loops while maintaining a unified management approach, thus achieving both ease of operation and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11669476B2Systems and methods for communication and/or control of scalable, modular network nodes
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA INC
  • US11669476B2 patent drawing
  • US11669476B2 patent drawing
  • US11669476B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and Systems are described for control at/of a network node. The network node can include a control module and first and second modules coupled to the control module. The first module can be configured to select first input/output (I/O) types of a field device coupled at an I/O interface of the network node. The second module can be configured to select a second I/O types of the field device. The first and second modules can be coupled to the I/O interface through a field device coupler.