Modular Nozzle Control for Precision Agricultural Spraying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural sprayer systems face challenges in efficiently and precisely applying fluids to fields, as they lack advanced control mechanisms for fluid flow and distribution, leading to potential over or under-treatment, waste, and variability in application due to factors like uneven terrain and plant growth.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a sophisticated electronic control system with modular valves, sensors, and instruments like cameras and accelerometers that allow for real-time monitoring and adjustment of fluid flow rates and patterns, ensuring precise application based on field conditions and plant analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional spraying systems are used, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but the fluid application precision and uniformity are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid application precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spray system is divided into multiple independently controllable nozzle groups, with each group having its own flow control valve. This segmentation allows precise control of fluid application in different field zones while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic flow control valves that can adjust fluid flow rates in real-time based on GPS location, field zone requirements, and plant density variations. This dynamic adjustment capability enables precise fluid application without requiring an overly complex fixed-system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If fluid flow rates are increased to cover larger areas, then productivity improves, but fluid waste and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespraying efficiencyVSAvoidfluid waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different nozzle groups are assigned different fluid flow rates based on local field conditions such as plant density, weed pressure, and soil type. This local quality approach ensures that fluid is applied at the minimum necessary rate in each zone, maintaining high productivity while minimizing overall fluid waste and environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that monitor fluid application rates, GPS position, and field conditions in real-time. This feedback is processed by a controller that dynamically adjusts flow rates to maintain optimal productivity while preventing over-application and fluid waste in any given area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If the system adapts to varying field conditions, then application uniformity improves, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication uniformityVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The field is divided into multiple zones with independently controllable nozzle groups, allowing localized adaptation to varying conditions without requiring complex system-wide control. Each zone can be adjusted independently based on its specific requirements, maintaining application uniformity while keeping control mechanisms manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses a universal controller that manages multiple nozzle groups with different functions (e.g., different fluid types, different flow rates). This multi-functional approach achieves application uniformity across varying conditions without requiring separate complex control systems for each zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of substance

If precise fluid application is achieved through multiple control valves, then fluid waste is reduced, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid waste reductionVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve system is segmented into multiple independently controlled units, each managing a specific nozzle group. This segmentation reduces fluid waste through precise local control while keeping each valve unit relatively simple and manageable, avoiding the need for a single complex high-capacity valve system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each nozzle group with its control valve operates semi-independently, allowing the system to self-regulate fluid distribution based on local conditions. This self-service capability reduces fluid waste without requiring complex centralized control, as each zone manages its own fluid application autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20220151216A1Agricultural spraying system
Publication Date: 2022.05.19 PRECISION PLANTING LLC
  • US20220151216A1 patent drawing
  • US20220151216A1 patent drawing
  • US20220151216A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Control modules in a network for controlling fluid flow to nozzles.