Modular Nuclear Fuel Recycling System with Fluorination and Electrowinning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current commercial reprocessing methodologies for used nuclear fuel (UNF) face limitations such as equipment size constraints due to water's neutron moderating properties, production of radioactive chemical waste, and proliferation concerns, particularly with the PUREX process and its derivatives.

Innovation Solution

A modular, integrated system that uses a series of connected vessels for recycling UNF, incorporating fluorination and electrowinning processes to convert uranium compounds to UF6 and separate plutonium and actinides, with nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) as a fluorinating agent to minimize contamination and proliferation risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If water is used as coolant and moderator in LWRs, then heat transfer and neutron moderation are improved, but equipment size is constrained due to neutron moderating properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidequipment size
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a liquid metal coolant (such as sodium or lead-bismuth eutectic) as an intermediary between the nuclear fuel and the heat exchanger system. This liquid metal coolant provides superior heat transfer properties without the neutron moderating effects of water, allowing for more compact reactor core design while maintaining efficient heat removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the coolant system by transitioning from water-based cooling to liquid metal cooling. This parameter change enables different operational temperatures, improved thermal conductivity, and altered neutron interaction characteristics, thereby resolving the contradiction between heat transfer efficiency and equipment size constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If PUREX process is used for reprocessing, then uranium and plutonium recovery is achieved, but radioactive chemical waste is produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuranium and plutonium recoveryVSAvoidradioactive chemical waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the problematic chemical waste generation step from the traditional PUREX process by using an aqueous-based reprocessing system that avoids organic solvents. This extraction of the harmful element (organic waste) while retaining the useful function (actinide recovery) resolves the contradiction between material recovery and waste production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the previously harmful organic solvent waste stream into a beneficial aqueous-based system where waste minimization is achieved. The aqueous system allows for easier waste treatment and reduces the generation of long-lived radioactive chemical waste, turning the original harm into a benefit through alternative chemistry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Quantity of substance

If PUREX process is used for reprocessing, then uranium and plutonium are recovered, but proliferation risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuranium and plutonium recoveryVSAvoidproliferation risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an aqueous-based chemical system as an intermediary that enables actinide recovery while inherently reducing proliferation risks. The aqueous chemistry provides different separation characteristics compared to traditional organic-based PUREX, allowing for recovery of uranium and plutonium in forms that are less suitable for weapons proliferation while maintaining industrial utility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If conventional reprocessing methods are used, then fuel recycling is achieved, but device complexity and facility size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel recycling capabilityVSAvoidfacility size and equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reprocessing function into modular aqueous-based processing units that can be integrated directly into the existing fuel cycle infrastructure. This segmentation allows for distributed, smaller-scale processing facilities rather than requiring large centralized plants, thereby reducing overall device complexity and facility size while maintaining fuel recycling productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient recycling of uranium and actinides with high decontamination factors, reducing the volume of radioactive waste and minimizing proliferation risks, while allowing for the recovery of valuable materials for reuse in advanced reactors.

Implementation Method 1

a fluorinating agent injected into the fluorination vessel reacts with the uranium compound to convert the uranium compound to UF6

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorination: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

An electrowinning vessel coupled to the fluorination vessel removing plutonium and actinides via electrowinning

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrowinning: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 3

separating fuel pellets from nuclear fuel rods via oxidation to produce a uranium compound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS20240120120A1Modular, integrated, automated, compact, and proliferation-hardened method to chemically recycle used nuclear fuel (UNF) originating from nuclear reactors to recover a mixture of transuranic (TRU) elements for advanced reactor fuel, and to recycle uranium and zirconium
Publication Date: 2024.04.11 CURIO SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20240120120A1 patent drawing
  • US20240120120A1 patent drawing
  • US20240120120A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A single integrated system for recycling used nuclear fuel (UNF) emerging from a reactor has a decladding vessel separating fuel pellets from nuclear fuel rods via oxidation to produce a uranium compound. A fluorination vessel is coupled to the decladding vessel. A fluorinating agent is injected into the fluorination vessel and reacts with the uranium compound to convert the uranium compound to UF6. An electrowinning vessel is coupled to the fluorination vessel removing plutonium and actinides via electrowinning.