Modular Operator Console for Optical Imaging Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operator-controlled devices for optical imaging systems, such as microscopes, often have mismatched configurations between the console and the imaging system, leading to increased complexity and the need for operators to monitor both devices simultaneously without feedback on set value adjustments, limiting flexibility and adaptability.

Innovation Solution

An operator-controlled device with modular components and a base component that allows for customizable assembly, including display means for set values, signal transmission, and ergonomic design, enabling operators to control imaging systems from a distance with flexible configuration and feedback on adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If separate operator-controlled devices are used for controlling imaging systems, then control functions can be activated from a distance, but device complexity increases due to duplicate operator-controlled elements on both the imaging system and the operator-controlled device

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote operation capabilityVSAvoidduplicate operator-controlled elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the imaging system's control interface on a separate operator-controlled device. The operator-controlled device displays a graphical representation of the imaging system with virtual control elements that mirror the physical controls on the imaging system itself. This allows operators to control the imaging system remotely without duplicating physical hardware, as the control elements are software-based representations rather than physical duplicates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computer as an intermediary between the operator and the imaging system. The computer runs software that communicates with the imaging system, translating operator inputs from the virtual interface into actual control commands. This intermediary layer enables remote operation while avoiding the need for duplicate physical control elements on both devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If operator-controlled elements are configured differently on the console versus the imaging system, then flexible control options are provided, but operator confusion increases due to non-corresponding configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol configuration flexibilityVSAvoidoperator confusion
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the control interface configuration dynamic and context-specific. The software on the operator-controlled device can be configured to match the specific imaging system being controlled, creating a localized adaptation rather than a universal interface. This allows the control elements to be arranged in a familiar, consistent manner for each specific system, preventing operator confusion while maintaining flexibility across different imaging systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the operator interface dynamic by allowing the software to adapt its configuration based on the connected imaging system. The virtual control elements can be dynamically generated or configured to match the physical layout of the specific imaging system, ensuring consistency. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing flexibility in supporting different systems while maintaining a consistent operator experience for each system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If feedback mechanisms are added to operator-controlled devices to show actual set values, then adjustment verification is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback on set valuesVSAvoidfeedback mechanism components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the feedback mechanism with the existing display functionality of the operator-controlled device. The feedback showing actual set values is integrated into the same graphical interface that displays the virtual control elements, rather than being a separate physical display device. This combining of control and feedback functions into a single software-based interface provides the necessary information feedback without significantly increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8902500B2Operating unit for optical imaging devices
Publication Date: 2014.12.02 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US8902500B2 patent drawing
  • US8902500B2 patent drawing
  • US8902500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operator-controlled device for optical imaging systems has modular components for inputting settings relating to the imaging of an object to be observed. The operator-controlled device further includes a display device for pregiven desired adjustment values and/or a display device for the actual adjustment values instantaneously achieved on the imaging system and transmitting devices for transmitting signals corresponding to the desired or actual adjustment values between the operator-controlled device and the imaging system. The operator-controlled device includes: at least one modular component for inputting desired adjustment values, a base component for accommodating one or more of the modular components and arrangements for manually and mechanically connecting the modular components to the base component and for manually separating the modular components from the base component.