Modular Optimization Pipeline for Code Execution Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional compilers are not optimally structured for computing performance, as source code optimized for human comprehension often requires transformation into lower-level code to improve execution speed, reduce size, and minimize power consumption, but existing optimization methods are inflexible and tied to specific compilation processes.

Innovation Solution

The development of modular, pluggable optimization modules that can run in various orders, allowing for flexible optimization of source code, intermediate representation, or object code, independent of translation, enabling rearrangement and customization of optimization pipelines to achieve specific goals like minimizing bytecode size, execution speed, and memory usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional compilers translate source code to machine code, then code execution speed is improved, but the optimization process becomes inflexible and tied to specific compilation processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode execution speedVSAvoidoptimization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into independent, modular optimization modules that can be applied separately at different stages (source code level, intermediate representation level, or object code level). Each module performs a specific optimization function and can be independently selected, configured, and executed, allowing flexible adaptation without being bound to a fixed compilation pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic optimization by allowing the optimization pipeline to be configured and adjusted at runtime. Users can select which optimization modules to apply, in what order, and at which code representation level, making the optimization process adaptable to different requirements rather than following a static compilation sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If source code is structured for human comprehension, then code maintainability is improved, but computing performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode maintainabilityVSAvoidcomputing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization actions by applying optimization modules to source code before compilation, to intermediate representation after initial compilation but before final code generation, or to object code after full compilation. This allows high-level code to remain human-readable while optimizations are progressively applied at appropriate stages without forcing a choice between readability and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate representation (IR) as a mediator between human-readable source code and machine code. Optimizations can be applied to the IR form, which preserves the structured nature of the original code for maintainability while enabling performance improvements through transformation. The IR serves as an intermediary that allows optimization without sacrificing code readability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If optimization modules are fixed in a compilation process, then implementation simplicity is improved, but the ability to customize optimization pipelines deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidpipeline customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization modules are designed with universal interfaces and standardized functionality that allows them to be used across different compilation stages and configurations. Each module implements a common optimization interface while providing specific optimization capabilities, enabling them to function universally in various pipeline arrangements without requiring custom implementation for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10191725B2Rearrangeable code optimization modules
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 META PLATFORMS INC
  • US10191725B2 patent drawing
  • US10191725B2 patent drawing
  • US10191725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are ways to flexibly arrange, rearrange, and execute optimization modules for program code in user-customizable sequences. In various embodiments, computer programmers can select an order of multiple standalone optimizers that each perform an optimization function on program code, forming a pipeline of a series of optimization modules. The pipeline can be modified by, for example, adding, removing, rearranging, repeating, and/or replacing optimization modules.