Modular Packaging Elements for Custom Protective Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional packaging methods for order fulfillment are inefficient and wasteful, often requiring excessive cushioning materials and larger containers, which can damage goods during shipment due to shifting and improper handling.

Innovation Solution

An automated packaging manufacturing system that produces custom protective structures using modular elements, which are rapidly assembled to form shapes that support and protect items based on specific packaging specifications, minimizing material usage and waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional packaging methods use excessive cushioning material to protect goods, then protection reliability is improved, but material waste and shipping costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection reliabilityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure is divided into multiple modular elements that can be independently manufactured and assembled. Each module contains cushioning cavities that are precisely sized to fit specific items, eliminating the need for excessive bulk cushioning material while maintaining protection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective structure provides differentiated protection levels in different regions - with cushioning cavities strategically positioned around fragile areas of items and rigid support structures in areas requiring stability. This localized approach ensures adequate protection without uniformly excessive material usage throughout the entire package.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional packaging uses large volumes of cushioning material to prevent shifting, then item stability is improved, but container size and handling costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem stabilityVSAvoidcontainer volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure segments the container space into defined zones using modular elements with rigid walls and cushioning cavities. Items are positioned within specific cavities that prevent movement in all directions, achieving stability without requiring the entire container volume to be filled with loose cushioning material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Items are nested within protective modules that are themselves nested within the container. The modular elements contain items in protective cavities, which are then arranged within the larger container structure, creating a hierarchical nesting arrangement that maximizes space efficiency while maintaining item stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Volume of stationary object

If conventional packaging fills remaining space with cushioning material after item placement, then space utilization is improved, but item damage risk increases due to applied forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoiditem damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure is pre-assembled with items placed in their designated cavities before the cushioning modules are closed and secured. This preliminary positioning ensures items are properly oriented and protected before any cushioning material is applied, preventing damage that could occur during the packing process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Cushioning material is applied locally within specific cavities and zones rather than uniformly filling all remaining space. The cushioning is concentrated in areas where items require protection, leaving voids in regions where no items are present, thereby achieving space efficiency without compromising item protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If automated packaging manufacturing produces custom protective structures rapidly, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidmanufacturing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing system produces protective structures using standardized modular elements that are pre-designed and pre-manufactured. These modules are then rapidly assembled through automated processes, dividing the complex manufacturing task into simpler, repeatable operations that increase productivity while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular elements are designed with standardized dimensions, materials, and connection mechanisms that can be manufactured using consistent parameters. This standardization allows automated manufacturing systems to produce various protective structure configurations by simply reconfiguring the assembly sequence rather than changing manufacturing parameters, thereby increasing productivity without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures secure positioning and protection of items during shipment by using precisely controlled amounts of material, reducing waste and costs while maintaining the custom shape and absorbing external forces.

Implementation Method 1

The self-adhering modular elements adhere to each other as the subsets of self-adhering modular elements are deposited and the self-adhering modular elements come into contact with each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS9840347B1Adhering modular elements for packaging structures
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 INTRINSIC INNOVATION LLC
  • US9840347B1 patent drawing
  • US9840347B1 patent drawing
  • US9840347B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In response to a request to package item(s), embodiments determine characteristic data for the item(s), which include an indication of a volume of each item. Container(s) for packaging the item(s) is determined based at least on the volume of each item. An arrangement of the item(s) in the container(s) is determined. One or more protective structures including one or more features are configured to position the item(s) in the container(s) according to the arrangement. Relative positions are determined for a plurality of modular elements to form the one or more protective structures. Subsets of the plurality of modular elements are deposited to corresponding relative positions to form at least one of the protective structures. The item(s) are packaged in the container(s) with the one or more protective structures to position the item(s) in the container(s) in the arrangement.