Modular Electrical Panel Design for Cable Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional electrical panels require numerous long cables for connection, leading to complex installations, high costs, energy losses, limited flexibility, and inefficient use of space due to their flat design and lack of logical component organization.

Innovation Solution

An electrical panel design featuring separate power and management cells with intuitive wiring logic, standardized cable lengths, and modular components that can be stacked or arranged in depth to reduce space usage, along with pre-equipment for easier assembly and reduced expertise requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional electrical panels use centralized power and management components, then all electrical components can be grouped in one location, but cable length increases and installation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation complexityVSAvoidcable length
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The electrical panel is divided into multiple modular cells (power cell, management cell, connection cells) that can be independently configured. Each cell handles specific functions, allowing components to be distributed logically rather than centralized, thereby reducing cable lengths while maintaining organizational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a flat two-dimensional panel layout to a three-dimensional modular cell structure. Components are arranged in depth across multiple layers and cells, utilizing vertical space and depth to reduce horizontal cable runs and improve spatial organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional electrical panels use long cables to connect remote equipment, then equipment can be placed far from the panel, but energy losses increase and installation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment placement flexibilityVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the panel into specialized cells (power, management, connection), the system can efficiently manage power distribution to remotely placed equipment while minimizing energy losses through optimized cable routing and reduced total cable length within the modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular cell design changes the physical parameters of the electrical distribution system, organizing components in three-dimensional space to reduce cable lengths and thereby reduce energy losses proportional to cable length, while still allowing equipment to be placed at various distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional electrical panels reserve 25% free space for future expansion, then future components can be added, but the panel design becomes less flexible and wastes space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpansion flexibilityVSAvoidpanel space utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The modular cell design provides dynamic adaptability - cells can be added, removed, or reconfigured based on actual needs rather than reserving fixed static space. The standardized cells allow for flexible expansion without requiring predetermined free space, as new cells can be integrated into the modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By utilizing three-dimensional space with modular cells arranged in depth and multiple layers, the panel achieves high space utilization while maintaining expansion flexibility. New cells can be added in available spatial configurations rather than requiring surface-level free space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If traditional electrical panels use flat two-dimensional configuration, then all components can be accessed from the front, but space is wasted and cable management becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent accessibilityVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a three-dimensional modular cell structure where components are arranged in depth across multiple layers. This vertical and depth-based organization maximizes space utilization while maintaining accessibility through the modular cell design, allowing front access to connection cells while managing cables efficiently within the structured three-dimensional framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3840142A1Automation of the production of electrical switchboards through an identified process
Publication Date: 2021.06.23 OCCHILUPO ANDREA
  • EP3840142A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3840142A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3840142A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to the field of electrical installations and, in particular, to the automation of the manufacturing of electrical switchboards adapted to their environment. The components of the electrical switchboards of the invention are organized in separate cells depending on whether they are powered by high or low current. The components are selected and organized according to their function and the family of equipment they control or power, in a clearly identified manner. This allows for simplified and safe intervention on the switchboard by an operator, even an unqualified one.