Modular Pest Deterrent System with Spatial Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pest deterrent systems are often resource-intensive, difficult to move, and can be learned to avoid by pests, leading to ineffective protection of gardens, especially in urban environments where space and noise considerations are critical.

Innovation Solution

A modular pest deterrent system comprising a sensor module and separate actuator modules that detect pest presence and generate deterrent stimuli at different locations, confusing pests and preventing them from learning the stimulus location, while being scalable, quiet, and inconspicuous.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional pest deterrent systems are used, then pests can be deterred, but the systems are resource-intensive and difficult to move

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest deterrence effectivenessVSAvoidsystem portability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pest deterrent system is divided into separate sensor modules and actuator modules that can independently function. Each module is compact and can be moved separately, improving portability while maintaining overall system effectiveness through coordinated operation within a defined radius.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor module and actuator module are designed to be universally applicable within the operation radius. The actuator module can respond to detections from any sensor module within range, creating a flexible, multi-functional system that adapts to different garden layouts and pest locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional pest deterrent systems are used, then pests are deterred, but pests learn to avoid specific areas reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest deterrence effectivenessVSAvoidpest learning behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between passive detection mode and active deterrent mode. Sensor modules continuously monitor for pests in passive mode, then transition to active mode when pests are detected, creating unpredictable behavior patterns that prevent pests from learning avoidance strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses wireless communication as an intermediary between sensor modules and actuator modules. This indirect communication allows the actuator to respond to sensor detections without a direct fixed relationship, adding unpredictability to the deterrent response location and timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If sensor modules and actuators are positioned at the same location, then detection and response are efficient, but pests learn to avoid that specific location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection and response efficiencyVSAvoidpest avoidance learning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system physically segments sensor modules and actuator modules into separate locations within the operation radius. This spatial separation prevents pests from associating a fixed location with deterrent stimuli, while the wireless communication maintains efficient detection and response coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-location deterrent approach to a multi-location distributed approach within the operation radius. By utilizing the spatial dimension of the operation radius, the system creates multiple possible response locations, preventing pest adaptation to a single deterrent point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If extensive resources and space are allocated for pest deterrent systems, then comprehensive protection is achieved, but the system becomes difficult to move and install

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarden protection coverageVSAvoidinstallation and mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive protection system is segmented into multiple small, independent modules rather than one large fixed system. Each module covers a portion of the garden, and together they provide complete coverage. The modular design allows easy installation and relocation without requiring extensive infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system covers a defined operation radius parameter that can be adjusted by positioning modules at different locations. By changing the spatial parameters of module placement rather than expanding the physical size of individual modules, comprehensive coverage is achieved while maintaining portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240245047A1Pest deterrent device
Publication Date: 2024.07.25 GROSSCUP ANDREW
  • US20240245047A1 patent drawing
  • US20240245047A1 patent drawing
  • US20240245047A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pest deterrent system includes a sensor module defining an operation radius and an actuator module configured to be positioned within the operation radius. The sensor module includes a sensor configured to detect a presence of a pest at a first location, and a first controller configured to receive a signal from the sensor. The actuator module includes an actuator configured to generate a deterrent stimulus at a second location when actuated, the second location being different from the first location, and a second controller configured to actuate the actuator.