Modular Pipe Rupture Sealing Clamps with Labyrinth Seal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pipeline repair methods, such as pipe rupture sealing clamps, face challenges in effectively sealing longer axial sections of damaged pipelines, especially those over 50 mm in diameter, due to weight and length issues, making axial displacement difficult or impossible.

Innovation Solution

A sealing arrangement comprising at least two pipe rupture sealing clamps with a radially circumferential extension and recess design that overlap to form a labyrinth seal, allowing for sequential arrangement and axial movement, reducing weight and enabling effective sealing of longer damages without requiring excessively long clamps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If a single pipe rupture sealing clamp is made longer to cover extensive damage, then the sealing coverage is improved, but the weight and difficulty of axial displacement increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing coverage lengthVSAvoidclamp weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing clamp is divided into multiple modular segments that can be connected together. Each segment has a manageable length and weight, but multiple segments can be assembled to cover extensive damage areas. The segments are coupled through connection elements that allow axial displacement during installation while maintaining sealing integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Length of stationary object

If a single pipe rupture sealing clamp is made longer to cover extensive damage, then the sealing coverage is improved, but the difficulty of axial displacement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing coverage lengthVSAvoidaxial displacement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp is segmented into multiple units that can be independently manipulated. Each segment can be axially displaced separately during installation, avoiding the handling difficulties of a single long clamp. The segments are connected after positioning to form the complete sealing arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple clamp segments are pre-assembled in a compact configuration before installation. This preliminary assembly allows them to be handled and positioned more easily, and then they are expanded or connected in situ to cover the required sealing length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Weight of moving object

If multiple pipe rupture sealing clamps are used to cover longer sections, then the weight is reduced, but the complexity of the sealing arrangement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal clamp weightVSAvoidsealing arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing system uses identical or standardized clamp segments that can be repeatedly assembled. This modular approach reduces overall weight while maintaining simplicity through standardization. The connection elements are designed to be straightforward, minimizing assembly complexity despite using multiple segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamp segments are designed as universal modules that can be used in various configurations to cover different damage lengths. The same basic segment design serves multiple purposes, reducing the need for specialized components and simplifying the overall arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Length of stationary object

If the sealing clamp is made longer to cover extensive damage, then the sealing coverage is improved, but the weight increases making handling difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing coverage lengthVSAvoidhandling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp is manufactured as separate modular segments of manageable size and weight. These segments are easier to handle during installation and positioning. The segments are then connected through standardized interfaces to achieve the required total sealing length, combining ease of handling with adequate coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for efficient and simple sealing of damaged pipelines by enabling the use of multiple shorter clamps to cover longer axial sections, reducing weight and facilitating easier installation and sealing, even in challenging conditions like underwater repairs.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic sealing body arranged inside. According to the invention, the sealing arrangement is characterized in that one sealing body has on the front side a radially circumferential extension that protrudes in the axial direction beyond the solid body, the other sealing body on the front side having a radially circumferential recess that is set back compared to a front side of the other solid body, the extension fitting in a form-fitting and fluid-tight manner into the recess

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3165804B1Connection of two pipe break seal ring and sealing assembly
Publication Date: 2017.11.29 KEULAHUTTE LUNEBURG ARMATUREN
  • EP3165804B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1d
  • EP3165804B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2d
  • EP3165804B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3d

AI summary

The present invention relates to a connection and a sealing arrangement (1) between two pipe rupture sealing clamps (2, 3; 21, 22), wherein the sealing bodies (9, 25) elastically arranged in the pipe rupture sealing clamps (2, 3; 21, 22) overlap at least section by section in the axial direction (A).