Modular Pool Ladder with Adjustable Leg Extensions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pool ladders require multiple designs for different deck heights, are difficult to ship and assemble due to numerous components, and often necessitate specialized tools, leading to increased manufacturing and shipping costs and user complexity.

Innovation Solution

A modular pool ladder design featuring leg extensions with continuous profiles, tread supports, and handrails that can be assembled tool-free, allowing for adjustable deck height compatibility and reduced component complexity through a single mold process for plastic components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple ladder models are designed for different deck heights, then compliance with APSP ladder codes is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and inventory costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck height compatibilityVSAvoidnumber of ladder models
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ladder leg incorporates an adjustable mechanism with multiple position settings that allow the ladder height to be dynamically changed according to different deck heights. This enables a single ladder model to adapt to various deck heights (48-60 inches) by adjusting the leg extension position, eliminating the need for multiple fixed-height ladder models while maintaining APSP code compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ladder design integrates multiple functions into a single model: it can accommodate different deck heights through adjustable legs, provide stable support through the A-frame structure, and ensure user safety with non-slip treads. This universal design allows one ladder model to replace multiple specialized models, reducing manufacturing complexity and inventory requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If ladders are shipped assembled, then product readiness is improved, but shipping cost and difficulty increase due to large size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct readinessVSAvoidshipping volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The ladder is designed as an assemble-from-components kit rather than a pre-assembled unit. The main components (leg assemblies, tread supports, handrails) are segmented into separate pieces that can be compactly packaged. This segmentation reduces shipping volume and allows standard packaging methods to be used, while the included instructions enable easy assembly by the end user to achieve product readiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If numerous components are used in ladder assembly, then structural integrity is improved, but assembly difficulty and tool requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidassembly simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The design combines multiple fastening functions into integrated connection mechanisms where leg assemblies connect to tread supports through built-in attachment features. This merging of components reduces the number of separate fasteners and tools needed while maintaining structural integrity. The A-frame configuration with cross-bracing provides inherent structural strength without requiring excessive numbers of individual fastening elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11591855B2In pool ladder assembly
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 PETTIT FREDERICK M
  • US11591855B2 patent drawing
  • US11591855B2 patent drawing
  • US11591855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pool ladder may have a first and second leg extension, each having a generally continuous profile; a first tread may comprise first and second through-holes, the first through-hole being sized to slidingly receive the generally continuous profile of the first leg extension, and the second through-hole being sized to slidingly receive the generally continuous profile of the second leg extension; and a first and second tread support. The first tread support may be engaged at a tread location on the first leg extension and may be separate from the first leg extension. The second tread support may be engaged at a tread location on the second leg extension and may be separate from the second leg extension. Each of the first and second tread supports may protrude from the respective leg extension a sufficient amount to prevent the first and second through-holes from sliding past the tread locations.