Modular Protection Helmet with Interchangeable Caps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current helmets lack adaptability in protection levels and are not suitable for aeronautic applications due to weight, design, and soundproofing issues, with ballistic elements having short lifespans and high replacement costs, and not being adaptable to varying threat levels.

Innovation Solution

A modular protection helmet with interchangeable external caps providing different protection levels, allowing the same internal cap to be used with either a lightweight base cap for civil use or a heavier ballistic cap for military use, using simple and cost-effective fixing systems, and designed for adaptability in the aircraft industry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If ballistic protection elements are used in helmets, then protection level against bullets and fragments is improved, but weight increases and makes helmets unsuitable for aeronautic applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic protection levelVSAvoidhelmet weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet is divided into two separable parts: an internal cap that provides basic protection and comfort, and an external ballistic cap that can be removed or interchanged. This segmentation allows the ballistic protection to be applied only when needed, reducing unnecessary weight during non-ballistic operations while maintaining protection capability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The helmet design allows dynamic adjustment of protection level by enabling the user to interchange between different external caps (ballistic cap, base cap, or no cap) based on the threat level. This dynamic adaptability ensures the helmet provides appropriate protection without carrying excessive weight during low-threat operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If ballistic helmets are used for military applications, then protection against direct and indirect impacts is improved, but lifespan is reduced to not more than 5 years requiring constant replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic protection capabilityVSAvoidhelmet lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the ballistic cap from the internal cap, the design allows only the external ballistic cap to be replaced after its 5-year lifespan expires, while the internal cap and other components can be reused. This extends the overall system lifespan and reduces replacement costs compared to replacing entire helmets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design enables selective replacement of only the worn ballistic cap while recovering and reusing the internal cap, comfort linings, and other components. This approach maximizes the utilization of durable components and reduces waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of manufacture

If fixed protection level helmets are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to varying threat levels is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidprotection level adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The internal cap is designed as a universal base that can accommodate multiple types of external caps (ballistic cap, base cap, aesthetic caps) through standardized fixing systems. This universal design maintains manufacturing simplicity for each component while achieving high adaptability through their combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The modular segmentation with standardized interfaces allows different cap types to be manufactured independently using simple processes, then combined to create helmets with varying protection levels. This maintains ease of manufacture for individual components while achieving versatility through configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If heavy ballistic caps are used continuously, then maximum protection is maintained, but user comfort and operational flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum protection levelVSAvoiduser comfort and flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet system enables dynamic adjustment of protection level by allowing users to interchange caps based on operational requirements. During low-threat operations, users can remove the heavy ballistic cap for improved comfort and flexibility, while maintaining the ability to quickly restore maximum protection when threats arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By separating the heavy ballistic cap from the internal cap, the design allows users to wear only the lightweight internal cap during non-ballistic operations, significantly improving comfort and reducing fatigue while maintaining the option to add ballistic protection when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3057459B1Modular protection helmet
Publication Date: 2021.06.23 LD PROJECT
  • EP3057459B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3057459B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3057459B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A modular protection helmet (1; 1A) having an internal cap (2) comprising a padding layer (6) and modular components, comprising an external cap (3) which can be removably and interchangeably fixed to the internal cap (2) and adapted to provide the desired protection level for civil use, and preferably the helmet comprises a second external cap (3A), which can be equally removably and interchangeably fixed to the internal cap (2) and adapted to provide a ballistic protection level, wherein said first (3) and second (3A) external caps can be replaced at will by the user as a function of the use from time to time intended for the helmet through removable coupling means (10, 11).