Modular Generative Models for Protein-Ligand 3D Docking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models face challenges in accurately predicting the three-dimensional (3D) structures of protein-ligand complexes due to scarcity of training data and computational complexity, particularly in integrating protein and ligand structures into a single predictive model.

Innovation Solution

A modular machine learning architecture comprising separate generative models for proteins and ligands, trained on abundant protein and ligand data, generates initial predicted 3D structures which are then combined to form protein-ligand complexes, leveraging denoising techniques and physics-informed neural networks for improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single integrated machine learning model is used to predict protein-ligand complex structures, then the model can directly generate the final prediction, but the scarcity of training data and computational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the prediction task into separate modules: a protein structure prediction model, a ligand structure prediction model, and a complex assembly model. Each module is trained independently on abundant protein and ligand data respectively, then combined to predict the final complex structure. This segmentation reduces the complexity of training a single integrated model while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If abundant protein and ligand data is used for training, then the training data availability increases, but integrating this data into a single model becomes computationally expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data availabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The training data is segmented and distributed to different modules: protein data trains the protein structure model, ligand data trains the ligand structure model. This allows each module to be trained on abundant data independently without requiring the computational resources needed to train a single integrated model on all data simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protein and ligand structures are predicted in advance by their respective models before being combined into the final complex structure. This preliminary action allows the system to leverage abundant training data for each component separately, reducing the overall computational burden compared to training one model on all data at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If separate generative models are used for proteins and ligands, then the training data availability expands, but the integration of these models adds architectural complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data availabilityVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses separate generative models for proteins and ligands that are trained on abundant respective data. The modular architecture allows each model to be independently optimized while maintaining manageable complexity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The separate protein and ligand generative models serve multiple functions: they can independently predict structures for their respective components, and when combined, they predict the complex structure. This multi-functionality justifies the modular architecture and reduces the perceived complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250272456A1Generative machine learning models for protein-ligand docking
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 GENESIS MOLECULAR AI INC
  • US20250272456A1 patent drawing
  • US20250272456A1 patent drawing
  • US20250272456A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for predicting 3D structures of protein-ligand complexes. In one aspect, a method comprises: receiving data characterizing a protein and a ligand; generating data characterizing an initial predicted 3D structure of the protein by processing data characterizing the protein using a protein generative machine learning model; generating data characterizing an initial predicted 3D structure of the ligand by processing data characterizing the ligand using a ligand generative machine learning model; generating data defining a predicted 3D structure of a complex comprising the protein and the ligand by processing (i) the data characterizing the initial predicted 3D structure of the protein and (ii) the data characterizing the initial predicted 3D structure of the ligand, using a protein-ligand generative machine learning model; and outputting the predicted 3D structure of the protein and the ligand.