Modular Pultruded Launder Cover for Wastewater Odor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing launder covers for wastewater treatment tanks are expensive, time-consuming to manufacture, limited to specific sizes, wasteful, and often interfere with odor control and wiper mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A modular launder cover panel assembly with adjustable dimensions, made via pultrusion or vacuum bagging, featuring an arced or ridged surface for universal fit, odor control gaskets, and integration within the scum baffle panel to avoid interference with wiper mechanisms, eliminating the need for stiffening flanges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If custom molds are used for each tank size, then the cover fits the specific tank dimensions, but the manufacturing cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover fit to tank dimensionsVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal mold that can produce covers for multiple tank sizes by adjusting the formwork or using interchangeable inserts. This single mold serves multiple functions across different tank diameters and launder trough widths, eliminating the need for custom molds for each size while maintaining precise fit-through-the-adjustment-mechanisms-built-into-the-universal-mold

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The cover design incorporates modular or adjustable components that can be configured for different tank dimensions. The formwork system is segmented into adjustable sections that can be repositioned to match various tank sizes, allowing the same mold to produce size-specific covers without requiring entirely different mold designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If custom molds are made for each tank size, then the cover fits the specific tank, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover fit to tank dimensionsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A single universal mold replaces multiple custom molds, significantly reducing tooling costs. The mold can be adjusted to produce covers for various tank diameters and launder trough widths, making the manufacturing process more cost-effective while maintaining the precision needed for proper fit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mold design allows for parameter adjustments (such as formwork position, insert configuration, or dimensional settings) to accommodate different tank sizes. This flexibility enables the same mold to produce size-specific covers without requiring expensive custom tooling for each dimension set

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If stiffening flanges are added to the cover, then the structural strength increases, but the cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover structural strengthVSAvoidcover structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs curved or arched cover designs that leverage geometric strength through curvature. The arched form distributes loads more effectively across the cover structure, providing the necessary structural strength without requiring additional stiffening flanges or complex reinforcement elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The cover utilizes composite materials (such as fiber-reinforced polymers or layered construction) that provide high strength-to-weight ratios. These materials inherently offer the structural strength needed while maintaining a simpler, flangeless design compared to traditional solid materials that would require additional stiffening elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the cover is designed to cover the entire launder width, then odor control improves, but interference with wiper mechanisms may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodor controlVSAvoidwiper mechanism operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cover design provides targeted odor control at critical areas (such as the launder walls and weir regions where odors escape) while maintaining clearance from wiper mechanisms. The cover may have extended sealing edges in specific locations for odor control while incorporating recesses or clearance zones where wiper mechanisms operate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cover is positioned within or nested against the scum baffle panel structure, which provides both odor control and clearance for wiper mechanisms. This nested arrangement allows the cover to achieve effective sealing while the scum baffle panel serves as an intermediate structure that prevents interference with wiper operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS11617972B2Launder cover and cover system and processes to make launder cover assemblies
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 ENDURO COMPOSITES INC
  • US11617972B2 patent drawing
  • US11617972B2 patent drawing
  • US11617972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The instant launder cover is readily fabricated by pultrusion, vacuum bag, or other non-sprayed methods and may advantageously be used with various sizes of tanks and/or launder troughs. The cover system effectively controls odor using, for example, optional gaskets while not requiring stiffening flanges or interfering with wiper mechanisms or other components of the tank or system.