Modular Pump Fluid End Housing with In-Line Valves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-pressure plunger pumps in oil field operations face issues with flow restrictions, premature seal failure, and structural fatigue due to large valve and seat sizes, as well as inefficiencies in fluid energy transfer and stress concentrations at bore intersections, which lead to cyclic fatigue and maintenance complications.

Innovation Solution

A modular fluid end design with a central fluid module and multiple suction seat modules, featuring an in-line configuration of bores to reduce stress and improve maintenance access, along with a reduced discharge port size and frusto-conical transition volume to minimize stress and fluid energy loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If large valve and seat sizes are used to reduce flow restrictions, then fluid flow and chamber filling are improved, but valve seal erosion and premature seal failure increase due to higher fluid velocity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow and chamber fillingVSAvoidvalve seal durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the valve and seat, specifically using a smaller seat diameter relative to the valve diameter compared to conventional designs. This parameter change allows the valve to maintain adequate flow area while reducing the velocity at the seat interface, thereby reducing erosion and extending seal life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality requirements to different parts of the valve system. The valve body is designed with sufficient flow area for productivity, while the seat area is optimized for reduced velocity and erosion resistance. This local differentiation allows simultaneous optimization of flow and durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If large valve and seat sizes are used to improve flow, then chamber filling is enhanced, but fluid end housing weight and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flowVSAvoidfluid end housing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the valve and seat dimensional parameters to achieve adequate flow with smaller overall dimensions. By carefully selecting the valve diameter, seat diameter, and flow area ratios, the design maintains productivity while reducing the housing size and weight required to contain the valve assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If large valve and seat sizes are used to reduce flow restrictions, then fluid energy is improved, but structural stresses on fluid end housing increase leading to premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid energyVSAvoidfluid end housing structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the fluid end housing, including wall thickness, bore intersection geometry, and support rib placement. These parameter changes allow the housing to withstand the stresses generated by adequate valve sizing while preventing premature structural failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If traditional fluid end design with intersecting bores is used to accommodate valves, then structural support is provided, but stress concentrations at bore intersections cause cyclic fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidresistance to cyclic fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional sharp intersecting bore geometry with curved, filleted transitions between bores. This curvature eliminates stress concentration points at bore intersections, significantly reducing cyclic fatigue and extending the service life of the fluid end housing while maintaining structural support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

5Ease of repair

If modular design with separated suction seat modules is used to improve maintenance accessibility, then ease of repair is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessibilityVSAvoidmodular assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the fluid end housing into modular segments, specifically making the suction seat modules separable from the main housing. This segmentation allows individual modules to be removed and replaced during maintenance without disassembling the entire pump, significantly improving ease of repair while the modularity itself manages the complexity through standardization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10655623B2Pump with segmented fluid end housing and in-line valve
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 VULCAN IND HOLDINGS LLC
  • US10655623B2 patent drawing
  • US10655623B2 patent drawing
  • US10655623B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plunger pump fluid end assembly design in which the suction valve and seat is aligned with the plunger and the fluid end housing is constructed with multiple modules. Modules are held in a rigid assembly by staybolts that connect to the power end of the plunger pump. Said staybolts pass though bores in the central fluid module and the suction seat module and bound by a conventional threaded nut. Packing box modules are bound to the central fluid module by bolts that also pass through separate bores in the same central module. A suction valve spring retainer/plunger spacer within the plunger bore of the assembly shields the intersection of the plunger bore and the discharge bore from destructive erosion damage.