Modular PV Roadway Luminaire Layout for Lower Wind Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pole-mounted roadway and area lighting luminaires powered by PV panels face issues such as increased wind loads due to high tilt angles, costly foundations and support structures, architectural disjointedness, inefficient power generation due to high surface temperatures, and placement of short-lived devices leading to high maintenance costs and urban eyesores.

Innovation Solution

The Delta luminaire system redistributes PV system elements, positioning short-lived, heavy devices below the mid-height of the pole, uses horizontal PV panels, and integrates thermal management to cool devices, while allowing for scalable and modular power generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If PV panels are tilted at high angles to capture maximum solar energy, then power generation efficiency is improved, but wind loads on the pole increase requiring stronger and more expensive support structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation efficiencyVSAvoidpole and foundation strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The PV panel tilt angle is made adjustable rather than fixed, allowing the system to optimize between power generation efficiency and wind load reduction. The panel can be tilted at high angles when wind is low and positioned at lower angles when wind conditions are favorable, dynamically adapting to environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical parameter of PV panel tilt angle based on operational conditions. By varying this parameter, the system achieves high power generation efficiency when needed while reducing wind exposure during high-wind periods, thereby avoiding the need for overly strong and expensive support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Illumination intensity

If PV panels are positioned high on the pole to avoid masking light, then lighting performance is improved, but maintenance costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity and maintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of positioning PV panels vertically high on the pole, the system transitions to a horizontal mounting configuration. This dimensional change allows the panels to be placed in a different spatial arrangement that avoids masking the light while reducing structural complexity and maintenance requirements associated with high vertical placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If PV panels are positioned horizontally to reduce wind loads, then structural costs are reduced, but power generation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural costVSAvoidpower generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic adjustment of PV panel tilt angles, allowing horizontal or low-angle positioning during high-wind conditions to reduce structural costs, while enabling high-angle positioning during calm periods to maximize power generation efficiency. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction between structural cost and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The PV panel positioning operates periodically, alternating between horizontal/low-angle positions for wind load reduction and high-angle positions for power generation optimization. This periodic adjustment allows the system to achieve both reduced structural costs and maintained productivity over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Ease of operation

If short-lived devices are placed high on the pole for easy access, then installation ease is improved, but maintenance frequency and urban aesthetics worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidmaintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing short-lived devices high on the pole for easy access, the system inverts the placement strategy by positioning these devices at ground level or in easily accessible locations. This inversion maintains installation ease while significantly reducing maintenance frequency and improving urban aesthetics by removing frequent maintenance points from elevated visible positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces material and maintenance costs, enhances power generation efficiency, and improves architectural integration by minimizing wind loads and surface temperatures, creating a more aesthetically pleasing urban environment.

Implementation Method 1

The PV technology harnesses the sun's electromagnetic photonic radiation and converts the energy to electrical power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Implementation Method 2

a first thermal conductor that conducts heat away from the PV panel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20260078882A1Delta luminaire - photovoltaic powered roadway & area lighting luminaire
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 EXPOSURE ILLUMINATION ARCHITECTS INC
  • US20260078882A1 patent drawing
  • US20260078882A1 patent drawing
  • US20260078882A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A slimline modular inverter pod coupled to a vertical structure configured to operate unitarily or in unison with other inverter pods coupled to the same vertical structure, wherein power received by the inverter pod is generated by PV panel/s coupled to the vertical structure above, and long-lived power consuming/generating devices are coupled to and/or in proximity to the vertical structure's top and at least one short-lived power consuming device is coupled to the vertical structure assembly at two thirds the vertical structure height from grade or lower.