Apparatus and method for equipment mounting and storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current datacenter rack cabinet systems are inefficient in terms of space and material usage, and fail to meet dynamic load requirements, particularly in seismically active areas, due to their rigid design and significant weight, which limits horizontal and vertical space utilization and increases costs.

Innovation Solution

A modular, seismically engineered building-block rack framework with extruded vertical and horizontal structural members that can be cut to length, allowing for efficient space utilization and dynamic load strength, featuring symmetrical designs for manufacturing efficiency and optional seismic bracing kits for adaptable seismic protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If steel box frame construction is used for rack cabinets, then structural strength is improved, but weight and material usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidrack cabinet weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rack cabinet is divided into modular components: a lightweight frame structure, removable shelving units, and separate bracing elements. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall weight while maintaining structural integrity through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs composite construction combining lightweight materials (such as aluminum or engineered wood) with strategic reinforcement elements. The frame uses hollow structural sections that provide high strength-to-weight ratio, while steel bracing is applied only where dynamically required for seismic resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If seismically engineered racks are implemented, then dynamic load requirements are met, but mass and material usage extend even further

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic resistanceVSAvoidrack cabinet mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Seismic bracing and reinforcement are applied locally only where dynamically required, rather than uniformly throughout the entire rack structure. Adjustable bracing elements are positioned at critical stress points identified through seismic analysis, providing necessary resistance while minimizing additional mass in non-critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rack incorporates adjustable and removable bracing elements that can be configured based on specific seismic requirements and equipment weight distributions. This dynamic configuration allows the structure to adapt to different load scenarios, providing seismic resistance only when and where needed, rather than being permanently over-engineered for maximum possible loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If standard 24-inch width rack cabinets are used, then compatibility with raised floor tiles is improved, but horizontal and vertical space utilization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor tile compatibilityVSAvoidfloor space utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The rack width is modified from the standard 24 inches to a reduced dimension (e.g., 19 inches or custom widths) while maintaining compatibility with standard infrastructure through adjustable mounting systems. This parameter change increases the number of racks that can be installed in the same floor space without requiring non-standard floor tiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention maximizes vertical space utilization by extending rack height to accommodate more equipment units vertically. By reducing horizontal footprint and increasing vertical capacity, the system effectively transitions space utilization from horizontal to vertical dimension, increasing overall equipment density without compromising floor compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If rack cabinets are shipped in assembled form, then installation is simplified, but shipping cost increases due to fixed standard height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The rack cabinet is designed as a modular assembly of lightweight components that can be efficiently packaged in flat-configured states for shipping. The frame, shelves, and bracing elements are segmented into compact units that stack efficiently, maximizing container space utilization and reducing shipping volume by 60-70% compared to pre-assembled racks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rack components are pre-drilled, pre-cut, and pre-finished in the factory before shipping, so that on-site assembly requires only simple fastening operations. This preliminary preparation maintains installation simplicity while enabling efficient disassembly and compact packaging for cost-effective shipping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3082506B1Apparatus and method for equipment mounting and storage
Publication Date: 2019.06.19 ARA USA LLC
  • EP3082506B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3082506B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP3082506B1 patent drawingFigure 2D

AI summary

A storage system for mounting equipment includes a plurality of vertical structural side members positioned at corners of the storage system. A plurality of horizontal structural members are coupled to the plurality of vertical structural side members. Specifically, each of the horizontal structural members has a plurality of corners, and each corner of each horizontal structural member is coupled to one of the vertical structural side members. Each vertical structural side member is an extrusion having a length selected to accommodate a desired height in a facility in which the storage system is installed.