Modular Rail Vehicles with Cable Propulsion for Infrastructure Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rail transportation systems face inefficiencies in fuel economy, infrastructure costs, traction requirements, noise pollution, and limitations in traversing steep grades due to heavy locomotives and frequent stops, which increase energy consumption and operational expenses.

Innovation Solution

A high-speed rail transportation system utilizing a cable assembly looped between propulsion and free cylinders, allowing for lighter infrastructure and more efficient energy use by propelling individual vehicles directly between stations, reducing the need for extensive track modifications and minimizing energy expenditure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional train systems use heavy locomotives to provide traction, then the necessary牵引力 is achieved, but the infrastructure becomes heavy and expensive to build and maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction forceVSAvoidinfrastructure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The train set is divided into independent modular cars that can be coupled and uncoupled at stations. Each car has its own propulsion capabilities, eliminating the need for a heavy centralized locomotive. This segmentation allows the train to carry only the necessary weight for each specific journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heavy locomotive is extracted from the train set concept. Instead of using a centralized propulsion unit, each car is equipped with its own lighter propulsion system, distributing the traction function across multiple independent units rather than concentrating it in one heavy component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If conventional trains make frequent stops to pick up and drop off passengers, then passenger convenience is improved, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger convenienceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The train set is segmented into independent modular cars that can be coupled and uncoupled at stations. This allows only the necessary number of cars to be transported on each leg of the journey, significantly reducing the mass that must be accelerated and decelerated at each stop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The train configuration is made dynamic and adaptable. Cars are coupled together to form train sets based on passenger demand for specific routes, allowing the system to optimize its mass and energy consumption for each journey rather than transporting the same heavy configuration regardless of demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If conventional trains are designed to travel at high speeds to compensate for frequent stops, then average speed is improved, but noise pollution increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaverage speedVSAvoidnoise pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The train is divided into independent modular cars with individual propulsion systems. This allows for more flexible speed management where each car can optimize its acceleration and cruising patterns, potentially reducing peak speeds and associated noise while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by using lighter, modular configurations that require less energy to accelerate and decelerate. This allows for more efficient speed profiles that may operate at lower speeds while maintaining acceptable travel times, thereby reducing noise pollution from high-speed operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Force

If conventional rail systems use heavy locomotives to traverse steep grades, then the ability to overcome gravity is improved, but the infrastructure cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegravitational forceVSAvoidinfrastructure cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The train system uses multiple independent modular cars with distributed propulsion rather than one heavy locomotive. This segmentation allows the system to climb grades more efficiently by distributing the gravitational challenge across multiple independently powered units, reducing the need for heavy reinforcement of infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its mass and propulsion distribution parameters to better handle steep grades. By using lighter modular cars with individual propulsion systems, the train can maintain better adhesion and climbing performance without requiring the same level of infrastructure reinforcement that heavy conventional locomotives would demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10118629B2High speed transportation system
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 KINKEAD JORDAN
  • US10118629B2 patent drawing
  • US10118629B2 patent drawing
  • US10118629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

High speed rail transportation systems are provided for improving transportation costs, speed and convenience for passengers, owners and operators. The high speed rail transportation system may include a high speed propulsion segment assembly, a segment of rails and a load station for transporting vehicles independent from each other and at high speed. In an embodiment, the high speed propulsion segment assembly may include a propulsion cylinder, a free cylinder and a cable assembly movably connected to the propulsion cylinder and the free cylinder.