Modular Reactor Facility Layout for Flexible Capacity Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The expansion of chemical production capacity is hindered by lengthy planning times, significant capital investments, and risks due to changing business climates, making it difficult to adjust production capacity efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A modular manufacturing facility using interconnectable modules, such as intermodal containers, that include reactors and support structures, allowing for flexible scaling up or down of production capacity with integrated equipment and piping, facilitating rapid assembly and disassembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If new manufacturing facilities are constructed or existing facilities are expanded, then production capacity increases, but planning time and capital investment increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing facility is divided into separate modular units that can be independently designed, manufactured, and assembled. Each module contains complete functional systems (reactors, separators, heat exchangers, control systems) that can be configured in different arrangements to meet varying production capacity requirements, enabling rapid scaling without extensive re-planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The facility design allows dynamic reconfiguration of modular units through standardized connection interfaces. Modules can be added, removed, or repositioned to adapt to changing production demands, business conditions, or technological updates, providing flexibility that eliminates long lead times associated with traditional fixed installations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If manufacturing facilities are expanded, then production capacity increases, but capital investment increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidcapital investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the facility into standardized modules, the capital investment is distributed across interchangeable units rather than requiring a single large-scale construction project. This allows for phased investment where modules can be added incrementally as capital becomes available, reducing the burden of significant upfront capital requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular units are designed with universal functionality and standardized interfaces that can be used across different configuration scenarios. A single module design can serve multiple purposes depending on its position and connection to other modules, reducing the variety of unique components needed and thereby lowering overall capital investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If manufacturing facilities are expanded, then production capacity increases, but space constraints become more difficult to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The modular design enables three-dimensional arrangement of functional units, allowing vertical stacking or multi-level configurations that maximize space utilization. Standardized connection interfaces facilitate arrangement in different spatial dimensions (horizontal rows, vertical columns, or multi-story configurations), enabling production capacity expansion without linearly increasing footprint area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If manufacturing facilities are expanded, then production capacity increases, but the risk of business climate changes affecting the investment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The facility incorporates dynamic adaptability through modular units with standardized interfaces that can be quickly reconfigured. If business conditions change, modules can be relocated, reconnected, or repurposed without extensive modification, allowing the facility to adapt to new market conditions, product demands, or technological requirements while protecting the invested capital

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design enables individual units to be removed or upgraded independently if business conditions change. Rather than being locked into a fixed configuration that must be abandoned entirely, specific modules can be discarded, relocated, or upgraded while retaining the core facility, thereby recovering value from the investment even when business climate changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentEP3908724B1Manufacturing facility
Publication Date: 2026.04.15 YEO JIE XIONG JONATHAN
  • EP3908724B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3908724B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3908724B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A manufacturing facility (12) is provided. The manufacturing facility (12) includes one or more interconnectable modules (10). At least one of the one or more interconnectable modules (10) includes a housing (14) and a reactor (16) in 5 the housing (14). The housing (14) has at least one charging inlet (18) and at least one discharging outlet (20). The reactor (16) has at least one reactor inlet (22) coupled to the at least one charging inlet (18) of the housing (14) and at least one reactor outlet (24) coupled to the at least one discharging outlet (20) of the housing (14).