Modular Resilient Member Structures for Robotic Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for systems that can be easily assembled to form resilient and dynamic structures, particularly for use in space applications, which require components that can be manipulated by robots or automated systems and provide both strength and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A resilient and dynamic member system comprising a central node with holding portions and hollow resilient members, connected by connector elements with helical springs, allowing for easy assembly and reconfiguration into various structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid structures are used to provide strength, then structural strength is improved, but flexibility and ease of reconfiguration deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidflexibility and reconfiguration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into modular components (nodes and resilient members) that can be independently assembled and reconfigured. Each node contains multiple holding portions that can independently engage with resilient members, allowing the structure to be segmented into manageable units that maintain strength while enabling flexibility in configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs resilient members (springs) that provide dynamic characteristics to the structure. These resilient members can compress and extend, allowing the structure to adapt to different configurations and absorb mechanical energy, thereby providing both strength and flexibility simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If complex assembly procedures are used to achieve precise configurations, then structural precision is improved, but ease of assembly and automation compatibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration precisionVSAvoidease of assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient members are designed to self-align and self-latch into the holding portions through their elastic deformation. When a resilient member is inserted into a node, the spring action automatically guides it into the correct position and secures it, eliminating the need for complex alignment procedures or specialized assembly tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The holding portions act as intermediaries that facilitate the connection between nodes and resilient members. These holding portions provide a standardized interface that simplifies the assembly process, allowing components to be connected through simple insertion and latching actions rather than complex fastening procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If modular components are used to enable reconfiguration, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The nodes are designed with multiple identical holding portions that can engage with any resilient member, creating a universal interface throughout the system. This universality allows the same basic components to serve multiple functions and be arranged in various configurations, reducing the need for specialized parts and simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables easy modification and integration into multiple configurations, providing strength and flexibility, suitable for applications such as models, toy systems, electronic systems, robotic systems, medical devices, and space systems.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient portion comprising a helical spring between the first solid end portion and the second solid end portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical spring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12420405B1Resilient and dynamic member systems
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 LETOURNEAU UNIV
  • US12420405B1 patent drawing
  • US12420405B1 patent drawing
  • US12420405B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Resilient and dynamic member systems are described. In some embodiments, a system may include a central node and a plurality of connector elements. The connector elements may include first and second end portions configured to be coupled to the central node. The connector elements may further include resilient portions between the first and second end portions.