Modular Robotic Kit Magnetic Connectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic educational kits lack easy and reliable connectivity between modules, limiting students' ability to learn about coding and programming, and are often unaffordable or lack interoperability.

Innovation Solution

A modular robotic kit with a three-wire electro-mechanical connectivity system using permanent magnets and Chicago screws/nuts for seamless wireless connection of modules, enabling quick prototyping and programmability through JSON-based communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standard multi-pole male-female connectors are used for module connectivity, then electrical connection is achieved, but the connection is not perceived as cool and lacks ease of operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of connectionVSAvoidconnector complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical male-female connectors with a magnetic connection system. Magnets embedded in the module housings provide automatic alignment and attachment when modules are brought together, eliminating the need for manual insertion of connectors and providing a more intuitive, cooler connection experience for students.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines mechanical, electrical, and magnetic functions into a single integrated connection interface. The connection point integrates structural support, electrical contacts for power and data, and magnetic elements for alignment and attachment, all in one unified interface rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If highly modular robotic kits are used, then interoperability and programmability are improved, but cost increases making them unaffordable for most schools

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemodularityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the robotic system into standardized modular components (chassis, sensors, actuators, power units) that can be independently manufactured and assembled. This segmentation allows for economies of scale in production while maintaining full interoperability through the standardized magnetic connection interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal connection standard that allows different module types to interoperate through a common magnetic interface. This universality enables schools to build diverse robotic configurations from a shared set of modules, reducing the need to purchase multiple specialized kit types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If magnetic connection is used for module assembly, then ease of operation and cool factor are improved, but connection reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges magnetic attachment with mechanical interlocking features and electrical contacts into a single integrated connection system. The magnetic force provides initial alignment and holding force, while mechanical features ensure precise alignment of electrical contacts and structural components, achieving both ease of operation and connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Quantity of substance

If single-configuration robots are used, then cost is reduced, but adaptability and number of possible activities are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidactivity variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the robotic system into interchangeable functional modules that can be reconfigured for different activities. Instead of providing multiple complete single-configuration robots, schools can purchase a set of modular components and assemble various robot configurations as needed, reducing cost while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a cost-effective, intuitive, and modular robotic platform that enhances students' programming skills and interoperability, allowing for various STEM applications and educational activities.

Implementation Method 1

The first set of electrical contacts and the second set of electrical contacts includes a Chicago screw configured to be inserted through a first magnet and a first side of a printed circuit board. The first set of electrical contacts and the second set of electrical contacts also includes a Chicago nut configured to be inserted opposite the Chicago screw through a second magnet and a second side of the printed circuit board to receive the Chicago screw.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10148036B2Multi-platform modular device
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 VANDERBILT UNIV
  • US10148036B2 patent drawing
  • US10148036B2 patent drawing
  • US10148036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-platform modular device including a plurality of platforms or modules. Each module implements a different function and can be connected to another module via a plurality of magnetic contacts. The magnetic contacts can be used for synchronization, communication, and power delivery between the modules.