Modular Rolling Mill Continuous Drive Train Power Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing modular finishing mills face power deficiencies when rolling larger product sizes due to decoupling of motors from the continuous drive train, necessitating larger, more costly motors to compensate.

Innovation Solution

A modular rolling mill design with interchangeable rolling units and a continuous drive train that utilizes multiple motors, featuring first and second gear units with interconnected shafts, allowing all motors to power the mill regardless of the number of rolling units in service, and enabling alternating orientations and inclinations of roll shafts for efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If rolling units are removed from the pass line when rolling larger product sizes, then the mill can handle higher tonnage rates, but motors become decoupled from the continuous drive train reducing available power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetonnage rateVSAvoidavailable power
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The drive train is segmented into multiple independent motor-gear unit modules (M1-A1, M2-A2, M3-A3, M4-A4) that can operate independently. Each motor-gear unit can remain coupled to the drive train even when rolling units are removed, allowing individual motors to continue providing power without being decoupled when productivity requirements change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gear units are designed with universal coupling mechanisms that allow them to connect to rolling units when present and maintain drive train continuity when rolling units are removed. The drive train system serves multiple functions: transmitting power during normal operation and maintaining motor coupling during high-tonnage operation with fewer rolling units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If larger motors are installed to compensate for power deficiencies, then available power increases, but the overall cost of the mill increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailable powerVSAvoidmill cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts power distribution based on operational requirements. When rolling units are removed for high-tonnage operation, the remaining motors dynamically adjust their power output and the drive train dynamically redistributes available power, eliminating the need for static oversizing of motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (motor coupling status, gear unit engagement, rolling unit configuration) rather than changing the fundamental motor size parameter. This allows the same motor configuration to provide different power levels under different operating conditions, avoiding the cost of larger motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If rolling units are made interchangeable with alternating orientations, then the mill can accommodate different product sizes, but the drive train complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct size rangeVSAvoiddrive train complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rolling units are designed with asymmetric coupling interfaces that accommodate alternating orientations (normal and reverse). The input shafts project from opposite sides of the housing, creating an asymmetric configuration that naturally supports interchangeability between different orientations while maintaining a relatively simple drive connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The rolling units can be installed in inverted orientations (alternate normal and reverse positions) to achieve different roll inclinations for various product sizes. This inversion principle allows the same rolling unit design to serve multiple product size ranges without increasing drive train complexity, as the coupling mechanism remains fundamentally the same.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS8171767B2Modular rolling mill
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 PRIMETALS TECHNOLOGIES USA LLC
  • US8171767B2 patent drawing
  • US8171767B2 patent drawing
  • US8171767B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular rolling mill has a mill pass line along which products are rolled in a rolling direction. The rolling mill comprises first gear units arranged along a first line parallel to the mill pass mill line. Each first gear unit is driven individually by a motor and has a pair of mechanically interconnected output shafts. Second gear units are arranged along a second line between and parallel to both the first line and the mill pass line. Each second gear unit has a pair of mechanically interconnected input shafts driving a pair of output shafts. Rolling units are arranged in succession along the mill pass line. Each rolling unit is driven by an input shaft and has a pair of mechanically interconnected roll shafts carrying work rolls. First couplings connect the output shafts of each first gear unit to input shafts of two successive gear units, and second couplings releasably connect the output shafts of the second gear units to the input shafts of two successive rolling units.