Modular Safety Device for Drive Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drive controllers require significant time and effort for implementing and extending safety functions, limiting flexibility and user customization, as these functions are predetermined and can only be modified by the manufacturer, necessitating extensive testing and certification.

Innovation Solution

A modular safety device within the drive controller comprising an evaluation unit, control-signal block, drive-signal block, programmable logic unit, and output unit, allowing users to assemble and load logic modules for customizable safety functions, such as stop, speed, and position control, without requiring manufacturer intervention or additional certification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If safety functions are firmly stored and predetermined in the safety device, then reliability is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety function reliabilityVSAvoidsafety function adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The safety device is divided into a predetermined safety function module (stored in read-only memory) and a programmable logic unit. The predetermined module ensures reliable safety functions, while the programmable logic unit allows customization through user-programmable logic modules, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety device combines static predetermined safety functions with dynamic user-programmable logic. The programmable logic unit can be configured differently for various applications while the core safety functions remain predetermined and reliable, enabling the system to adapt to different needs without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If every safety function is fully programmed and tested, then reliability is improved, but time and effort for implementation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety function reliabilityVSAvoidimplementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The safety functions are predetermined and pre-programmed in the safety device during manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures reliability while allowing users to simply select and activate needed functions through parameter setting rather than full programming, significantly reducing implementation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The safety device is designed as a universal platform with multiple predetermined safety functions that can be activated through parameterization. Users can select from a library of pre-tested safety functions and combine them with custom programmable logic, eliminating the need to fully program and test each function from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If safety functions are executed in the drive controller, then response time is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety response speedVSAvoiddrive controller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety device is integrated into the drive controller as a combined unit. This merging allows safety functions to be executed with the same fast response time as drive control functions while sharing common hardware resources, thus avoiding the need for a separate safety controller and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the user can extend safety functions, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety function extendabilityVSAvoidsafety function reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety device separates predetermined reliable safety functions (stored in read-only memory) from user-programmable logic (in programmable logic unit). Users can extend functionality by programming additional logic modules that work alongside the predetermined functions, maintaining reliability of core safety functions while enabling customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11009851B2Drive controller and drive system
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 BECKHOFF AUTOMATION GMBH
  • US11009851B2 patent drawing
  • US11009851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive controller comprises an evaluation unit to receive and evaluate a first item of feedback information from a motor connected to the drive controller, a control-signal block connected to secure inputs of the drive controller to receive condition control signals and to provide the condition control signals as input signals, a drive-signal block connected to the evaluation unit to calculate a first speed and/or a first position on the basis of the first item of feedback information on at least a first channel and to provide a first speed signal and/or a first position signal, a programmable logic unit connected to the control-signal block and the drive-signal block to realize the safety functions and the speed signal and/or the position signal to provide switch-off signals, and an output unit connected to the logic unit and to secure outputs of the drive controller to output switch-off signals on safety-switch-off paths.