Modular Demountable Safety Panels for Motor Racing Circuits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor racing circuit safety systems lack modularity, ease of assembly and disassembly, and structural integrity, making them inadequate for temporary urban circuits where quick access and reconfiguration are necessary, and they often fail to meet safety standards set by the International Automobile Federation.

Innovation Solution

A demountable modular panel system that can be easily assembled and disassembled, compatible with both concrete bases and metal barriers, featuring a tubular metal shaft and rectangular retaining brackets for secure attachment, allowing independent removal and reconfiguration of panels, and optional steel cable reinforcement for enhanced structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional safety systems are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but modularity and ease of assembly/disassembly are poor

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveease of assembly and disassemblyVSAvoidsystem modularity

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is divided into modular panels that can be independently assembled and disassembled. Each panel is a self-contained unit with standardized connection interfaces, allowing rapid deployment and reconfiguration without requiring complex structural modifications.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels are designed with universal connection mechanisms that can be installed on both concrete bases and metal barriers. The standardized interfaces allow the same panel design to work across different installation scenarios, simplifying inventory and assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional safety systems are used, then continuous protection is provided, but access and reconfiguration are difficult

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveaccess and reconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidcontinuous protection

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous barrier is segmented into discrete panels that can be independently removed or repositioned. This allows access points to be created quickly by simply detaching individual panels rather than dismantling large sections, while maintaining overall system integrity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static continuous barrier to a dynamic modular structure. Panels can be rapidly added, removed, or repositioned based on operational requirements, enabling the barrier to adapt to changing access needs while maintaining protective function.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If modular panels are used, then ease of transport and assembly are improved, but structural robustness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveassembly speedVSAvoidstructural robustness

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Connection elements and mounting hardware are pre-installed on each panel during manufacturing. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for complex field assembly operations, allowing panels to be quickly installed while ensuring consistent connection quality and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Standardized connection interfaces and mounting brackets serve as intermediaries between panels and support structures. These intermediary elements distribute loads effectively and provide robust mechanical connections while maintaining the modular nature of the system.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of repair

If demountable panels are used, then maintenance and replacement are easier, but structural interconnection may be weaker

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvepanel replacement easeVSAvoidstructural interconnection

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of repairVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system is segmented into replaceable panels with standardized connection points. Individual panels can be quickly removed and replaced without affecting adjacent panels, facilitating easy maintenance while the standardized connections ensure consistent structural integrity across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection mechanism uses adjustable parameters such as bolt tension and connection geometry to maintain optimal structural integrity. These parameters can be standardized across all panels to ensure consistent performance whether panels are permanently installed or frequently replaced.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10335707B2Modular demountable safety panels, compatible with application on concrete bases or metal barriers at motor racing circuits and their respective assembly process

Publication Date: 2019.07.02 LEADERTECH UNIPESSOAL LDA ZONA FRANCA DA MADEIRA

AI summary

A new type of demountable modular panel and its respective assembly process, intended for use on motor sports circuits, particularly on urban circuits. It has the advantage of being easily assembled and disassembled, allowing easy access to any point on the circuit. It can be used on metal barriers or on concrete bases fitted with “U” section metal guides at their ends, into which a metal support profile is inserted. Above the base, a fencing panel is placed, with a top section included at 45°. A tubular metal shaft is introduced vertically through metal connectors and tightly clamped in rectangular retention brackets. The attachment of the panel is reinforced by “L” section metal brackets and respective bolts with washers.