Modular Vehicle Seat with Interchangeable Bolsters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle seating systems lack flexibility and adaptability, as they do not allow for easy customization or replacement of components such as side bolsters and headrests without requiring the entire seat to be removed, and they often do not provide adequate energy attenuation for blast impacts.

Innovation Solution

A modular seating system featuring a universal center module with interchangeable side bolsters and headrests, equipped with a plug-in mechanism using rigid parallel bars and sockets, allowing for easy installation and removal of components while maintaining energy attenuation capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional integrated seating system is used, then the seat structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the system lacks flexibility and adaptability for customization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization flexibilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seating system is divided into distinct modular components including a center module, side bolsters, and headrest assemblies. Each component can be independently manufactured, customized, and replaced. The side bolsters are separated from the center module and can be interchangeably attached using the bar and socket mechanism, enabling customization without redesigning the entire seat structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The center module is designed as a universal platform that can accommodate multiple configurations of side bolsters and headrests. The standardized bar and socket interface allows different bolster designs to be mounted on the same center module, providing multi-functionality and adaptability across various seating applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of repair

If the entire seat is removed for component replacement, then component replacement is possible, but the maintenance time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent replacement easeVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The side bolsters are designed as separable components that can be independently removed from the center module. The bar and socket connection allows bolsters to be detached and replaced without affecting the center module or other seat components, enabling rapid maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bar and socket mechanism allows side bolsters to be easily extracted from the center module. The removable bars can be quickly detached from the sockets, enabling component replacement without disassembling the entire seat structure or removing the seat from the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional seating systems are used, then the structure is simple, but energy attenuation for blast impacts is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblast impact protectionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular structure with separable side bolsters and energy attenuation layers creates discrete zones for energy management. The side bolsters can be designed with specific energy-absorbing characteristics, and the modular arrangement allows these protective elements to be positioned optimally without requiring a complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If customized seating configurations are implemented, then adaptability improves, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating configuration flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the seating system into standardized modules with consistent interfaces, each component can be manufactured independently using optimized processes. The repetitive bar and socket connection design simplifies manufacturing across different configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The universal center module design serves as a common platform for multiple bolster and headrest configurations. This allows the majority of the seat structure to be mass-produced once, while only the interchangeable components need varied manufacturing, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10882432B1Modular seating system
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 ARMORWORKS ENTERPRISES INC
  • US10882432B1 patent drawing
  • US10882432B1 patent drawing
  • US10882432B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are provided for a modular vehicle seating system. In one embodiment the seating system has a universal center module that is mountable to a seating position in a vehicle and includes seat pan and seat back portions. The seating system may further include a matched pair of modular side bolsters selectable from an assortment of matched pairs of side bolsters, where each matched pair has a particular physical property defined by a unique value in a range of values of the physical property in the assortment. The side bolsters are detachably connectable to the to left and right sides of the universal center module with fasteners.