Modular Seat Actuation Control via Peer-to-Peer Bus Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional seat control systems for aircraft seats are inefficient due to excessive wiring, slow system response, and lack of modularity, with failure of the main controller causing the entire system to malfunction.

Innovation Solution

A modular seat actuation control system using a peer-to-peer network with interconnected control modules over a communication bus, where each module autonomously controls its associated seat device, processes status information, and broadcasts data packets with priority, allowing distributed processing and independent operation without a central controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a main controller directly controls all actuators and devices, then the system has centralized control capability, but the wiring becomes excessively complex and the system response slows down

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewiring complexityVSAvoidsystem response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent control modules, each responsible for specific actuators or devices. Each module has its own processor and memory, enabling distributed control. This segmentation reduces wiring complexity by eliminating the need for all modules to connect to a central controller, and improves system response speed by enabling parallel processing of control signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a main controller performs all processing functions, then the control logic is centralized, but the system lacks modularity and upgradeability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem modularityVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent control modules, each with its own processor and memory. Each module can be independently upgraded or replaced without affecting other modules, providing high modularity and adaptability. The standardized communication bus allows for easy integration of new modules with updated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If the main controller coordinates all actuator operations, then centralized control is achieved, but the amount of wiring increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewiring quantityVSAvoidsystem coordination efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Control modules communicate with each other through a standardized communication bus, acting as intermediaries in the control network. This eliminates the need for direct point-to-point wiring between the main controller and all actuators. The communication bus provides an efficient medium for coordinate control information, maintaining system coordination efficiency while substantially reducing wiring quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If all control signals are generated and sent from a single controller, then the control architecture is simple, but the system fails completely if the main controller malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent control modules, each with its own processor and memory. This distribution of control functions means that if one module fails, the others can continue to operate independently, significantly improving system reliability. The modular architecture adds complexity at the module level but simplifies the overall system fault tolerance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Device complexity

If separate connection leads are used for each actuator, then direct control is achieved, but the wiring becomes excessively complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection wiringVSAvoidsystem installation and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple control signals and data streams are merged into a single communication bus that connects all control modules. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate connection leads for each actuator, substantially reducing wiring complexity. The standardized bus interface simplifies installation and maintenance, as modules can be connected and disconnected without complex wiring changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9422058B2Modular seat actuation control system and communication method
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 HYDRO AIRE AEROSPACE CORP
  • US9422058B2 patent drawing
  • US9422058B2 patent drawing
  • US9422058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A seat actuation control system includes at least one seat having a plurality of seat devices and a plurality of control modules interconnected over a communication bus. Each module is associated with a corresponding seat control device and is configured to control its corresponding seat device. Each module includes a processor and a memory coupled to the processor and storing program instructions therein which include receiving a status packet from each of the other control modules over the communication bus, processing the status packet for updating the overall system status, and actuating the seat device based on the overall system status. The program instructions further include determining status of the corresponding seat device, generating a status packet including the status information, and broadcasting the status packet to the other modules over the communication bus.