Multi-layered Modular Security Barriers for Vehicular Intrusion Defense

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security systems for restricted areas are inadequate in preventing intrusion by vehicles and pedestrians, as they lack multi-layered defense mechanisms and are often expensive and difficult to install and maintain, with existing solutions failing to effectively stop smaller vehicles and provide sufficient crowd control.

Innovation Solution

A multi-layered security system comprising a series of barriers with anti-climb mesh and free-rolling rollers, spike barriers, and modular vehicle barriers, arranged in a spaced relationship to create multiple layers of defense, which can be easily assembled and upgraded to provide enhanced security against both pedestrian and vehicular intrusions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If concrete bollards, planter boxes and monuments are arranged in spaced apart relationship to impede vehicle access, then security against large vehicles is improved, but access by smaller vehicles such as cars and motorcycles remains possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidcoverage against different vehicle sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The security system is divided into multiple modular barriers (first barrier, second barrier, third barrier) arranged in spaced apart relationships. Each barrier consists of discrete elements that can be independently positioned to create a multi-layered defense system that adapts to different vehicle sizes and threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-layer spaced barrier to a multi-layered three-dimensional arrangement with barriers positioned at different locations and orientations. This includes barriers with different heights and configurations (such as the fourth barrier with different height portions) to address vulnerabilities at various levels and angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If heavy concrete bollards, planter boxes and monuments are used to create security barriers, then security strength is improved, but transportation and installation require large trucks and heavy lifting equipment such as cranes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier strengthVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system is segmented into multiple modular components (first barrier, second barrier, third barrier, fourth barrier) that can be manufactured, transported, and installed separately. This segmentation allows lighter individual components to be moved without heavy lifting equipment while maintaining overall system strength through their coordinated arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs barriers with varying physical parameters including different heights (such as the fourth barrier with first and second portions of different heights), different materials, and different configurations. This allows optimization of each component's weight and strength characteristics to facilitate easier installation while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a single layer of fencing is used to restrict access, then simplicity of installation is improved, but the fence can be easily climbed or pushed over by intruders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidintrusion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single-layer fence is replaced with a multi-layered barrier system where each layer (first barrier, second barrier, third barrier) provides an additional level of intrusion resistance. The spaced apart arrangement creates multiple defensive layers that intruders must overcome sequentially, significantly increasing resistance while maintaining modular installation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The defense system evolves from a two-dimensional single layer to a three-dimensional multi-layered structure with barriers positioned at different locations, heights, and orientations. This dimensional expansion creates a more complex intrusion path that maintains installation simplicity through modular assembly while dramatically improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If barriers are installed to prevent vehicular attacks in public places, then security against vehicle ramming is improved, but the barriers must be permanently fixed and are difficult to relocate for different events or threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle attack preventionVSAvoidrelocatability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system is designed as modular, segmented units (first barrier, second barrier, third barrier, fourth barrier) that can be independently assembled and disassembled. This modular construction enables the barriers to be relocated and reconfigured for different public places, events, or threat scenarios while maintaining their vehicle attack prevention capabilities through proper assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3568545B1Security system
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 STRIKE DE FENCE PTY LTD
  • EP3568545B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3568545B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3568545B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A multi-layered security system having an attack side, the security system comprising a plurality of barriers arranged in a spaced apart relationship with respect to each other, wherein each pair of barriers are located opposite to each other to define another barrier comprising a passage located between the pair of barriers located opposite to each other. The system can additionally comprise security defences such as anti-climb mesh, spike barriers or rollers. The system further comprises a link bar to join together adjacent panels and create barriers. The link bar comprises a means for joining together adjacent panels on both ends and maintaining the panels in a spaced apart relationship. The link bar can also comprise a means for maintaining the panel in an erected condition by securing it to the ground.