Modular self-service checkout system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional self-checkout machines (SCOs) have a large physical footprint, are not easily reconfigurable, and require costly logistics due to their monolithic design, making it difficult for retailers to customize their checkout areas and adapt to changing needs.

Innovation Solution

A modular self-service terminal (SST) system that includes a base SST system with a host device and a set of peripherals, which can be operated standalone or docked with additional peripherals, allowing for custom configurations and easy attachment/removal of accessories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional SCOs are designed as all-in-one appliances with integrated peripherals, then the system provides complete functionality for self-service transactions, but the physical footprint and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidphysical footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The self-service terminal is divided into a base unit and separate peripheral modules (scanner, printer, card reader, etc.). These modules can be selectively attached or detached to create customized configurations based on specific retail needs, reducing the physical footprint while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base unit is designed with universal interfaces and communication protocols that can work with multiple different peripheral modules. This allows a single base unit to serve multiple functions by connecting to different peripherals, reducing the need for multiple complete SCO units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional SCOs are designed as monolithic integrated units, then the system provides stable and reliable operation, but the ability to reconfigure and adapt to changing retailer needs is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereconfigurabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into independent modules with standardized interfaces. This segmentation enables easy reconfiguration by attaching or detaching peripherals without affecting the core base unit, simplifying the reconfiguration process while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static monolithic design to a dynamic modular architecture where peripherals can be added or removed based on changing requirements. The base unit maintains dynamic communication capabilities to adapt to different peripheral configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If conventional SCOs are shipped as large complete units, then the system ensures all components are available for operation, but logistics and shipping costs increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment efficiencyVSAvoidshipping volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system is shipped as separate modular components (base unit and peripheral modules) rather than as one large integrated unit. This segmentation reduces shipping volume and allows retailers to receive only the components they need, improving deployment efficiency while reducing logistics costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base unit is pre-configured with communication interfaces and software capabilities, while peripherals are prepared separately. This preliminary preparation allows for rapid assembly and deployment at the retail site without requiring complex integration work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional SCO peripherals are integrated within a single housing, then the system maintains structural stability, but the ability to rearrange and reconfigure components is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperipheral arrangement flexibilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Peripherals are segmented into separate detachable modules rather than being permanently integrated into a single housing. Each module maintains its own structural integrity while connecting to the base unit through standardized interfaces, allowing rearrangement without compromising stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12288450B1Modular self-service checkout system
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 NCR VOYIX CORP
  • US12288450B1 patent drawing
  • US12288450B1 patent drawing
  • US12288450B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A base self-service terminal (SST) system comprises a host device and a first set of peripherals. The base SST system can operate in standalone mode to process self-service transactions when the base SST system is placed on a horizontal surface or mounted to a pedestal. The base SST system processes the self-service transactions utilizing the first set of peripherals and a second set of peripherals when the base SST system is docked within an integrated peripheral device or a peripheral bridge appliance. The integrated peripheral device comprises the second set of peripherals or the second set of peripherals are made available through the peripheral bridge appliance. One or more additional peripherals are attachable and removable from the base SST system and one or more accessory modules are attachable and removable from the base SST system, the integrated peripheral device, and/or the peripheral bridge appliance.