Modular Sensor Network for Object Detection and Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sensor technologies face limitations in detecting and tracking unmanned aerial, surface, and ground vehicles, especially in complex environments, due to single-sensor deficiencies, false alarms from RF noise, and difficulty in accurately locating and tracking objects.

Innovation Solution

A modular sensor network design with RF modules, enhanced by EO/IR and radar modules, utilizing various distribution models such as stationary, mobile, hybrid, and grid patterns, and network topologies like Star, Mesh, and Tree, to improve detection, location, and tracking capabilities, with data sharing and processing across sensors and servers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to enhance detection and tracking capabilities, then measurement precision and reliability improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection task by deploying multiple independent sensors (RF, EO/IR, radar, acoustic) that each handle specific detection functions. Each sensor operates independently to detect different aspects of threats, with results aggregated by a fusion center to achieve comprehensive detection precision without requiring a single complex sensor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple sensor types (RF, EO/IR, radar, acoustic) into a unified sensor network system where data from all sensors is combined and processed by a fusion center. This merging approach achieves superior detection and tracking precision by leveraging the complementary strengths of different sensor technologies while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple sensors form a network to reduce false alarms, then reliability improves, but loss of energy increases due to data communication and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex data processing and fusion operations from individual sensors and centralizes them in a dedicated fusion center. This allows sensors to perform only lightweight local processing and transmit raw or pre-processed data, reducing their energy consumption while the fusion center handles the computationally intensive tasks of reducing false alarms and improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The fusion center acts as an intermediary between multiple sensors and the final detection output. It receives data from all sensors, performs correlation analysis to reduce false alarms, and generates unified detection results. This intermediary approach improves reliability through cross-validation while managing energy consumption by optimizing data communication protocols and processing strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If sensors are deployed in various distribution models to extend monitoring zones, then area of coverage increases, but device complexity and deployment difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring zoneVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sensor deployment models where sensors can transition between stationary and mobile states based on operational requirements. Mobile sensors can be deployed to extend monitoring zones temporarily, then returned to base. The system dynamically adjusts sensor positions, activation states, and data fusion strategies to optimize coverage area while managing deployment complexity through automated coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor network is designed with universal, multi-functional sensors that can operate in various distribution models (stationary, mobile, hybrid, grid patterns) and support multiple detection modalities (RF, EO/IR, radar, acoustic). This multi-functionality allows the same sensor platform to adapt to different deployment scenarios and extend monitoring zones without requiring specialized hardware for each configuration, thereby reducing overall deployment complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If RF modules are used to detect radio-silent drones, then detection capability improves, but false alarms increase due to RF environment noise and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines RF detection with other sensor modalities (EO/IR, radar, acoustic) in a multi-sensor fusion system. RF modules detect potential threats while other sensors provide corroborating evidence to confirm or reject detections. This merging of detection capabilities maintains high detection capability for radio-silent drones while reducing false alarms through cross-validation and correlation analysis in the fusion center.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the performance of single sensors by forming a network that can accurately detect and track multiple objects, reduce false alarms, and provide robust location information, extending monitoring zones and improving power efficiency through dynamic adjustments and data redundancy.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor using an RF module as the basic detection method can be enhanced by adding different modules like EO/IR or radar, and therefore be able to detect and mitigate most types of threats

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRF signal detection: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a radar-based sensor cannot detect a small drone at low altitude

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 3

an EO/IR-based sensor may have trouble differentiating between a bird and a bird-like drone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared Radiation: Infrared Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS11768267B2Sensor network system and deployment for object detection, tracking and mitigation
Publication Date: 2023.09.26 AERODEFENSE LLC
  • US11768267B2 patent drawing
  • US11768267B2 patent drawing
  • US11768267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are different distributed sensor network models, use cases, and details of the components of each model to achieve the goal of monitoring, detecting, tracking, and mitigating a target(s) such as a signal, an object, a phenomenon, etc. An independent sensor or a local sensor network may supply data to one or more fusion center(s) that collect(s) data and perform(s) higher logic to enhance system performance. A local sensor network allows independent sensors or other local sensor networks to merge into the local sensor network. A sensor cloud can be formed by multiple local sensor networks and independent sensors. By using different distribution models, the local sensor network can provide protection for various targets like Very Important Personnel (VIP) vehicles, lands, facilities, and cities.