Modular Sensor Node Segmentation for Power Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless sensor network nodes are either inflexible and power-efficient for single applications or flexible but power-hungry for multiple applications, and they inefficiently utilize central processors for various tasks.

Innovation Solution

A modular sensor network node design featuring a system bus connected to sensor modules, a communication module, and a processing module, with a resource-specific low-power processor for module management and a distributed controller to regulate power and communication, separating data and control buses for efficient power use and task distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a powerful general-purpose central processor is used to support multiple applications, then adaptability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The processing functionality is segmented into two distinct processors: a general-purpose processor for complex tasks and data analysis, and a resource-specific processor for routine sensor management and control. This segmentation allows the system to use only the necessary processing power for each task, avoiding the continuous high power consumption of a single powerful processor while maintaining adaptability through the general-purpose processor when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically allocates tasks between the two processors based on requirements. The resource-specific processor handles routine operations continuously, while the general-purpose processor activates only when complex processing is needed. This dynamic task allocation optimizes power consumption by keeping the high-power processor in low-power states during idle periods while maintaining system adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If a low-power optimized processor is used for a specific application, then power consumption is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The processing functionality is segmented into two distinct processors: a general-purpose processor for complex tasks and data analysis, and a resource-specific processor for routine sensor management and control. This segmentation allows the system to use only the necessary processing power for each task, avoiding the continuous high power consumption of a single powerful processor while maintaining adaptability through the general-purpose processor when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The general-purpose processor provides universal processing capability that can handle multiple applications and complex tasks, while the resource-specific processor handles application-specific routine operations. Together, they create a multi-functional processing system that achieves both low power consumption for routine operations and high adaptability when the general-purpose processor is engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If a central processor handles all tasks including simple sensor management, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to inefficient processor utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidprocessor utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing workload is segmented and distributed between two specialized processors. The resource-specific processor is dedicated to sensor management, data acquisition, and control functions, while the general-purpose processor handles complex data analysis, processing, and decision-making. This segmentation improves productivity by ensuring that simple tasks are handled efficiently by the specialized processor without being bottlenecked by the general-purpose processor's higher-level operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The resource-specific processor acts as an intermediary between the sensors and the general-purpose processor. It manages the sensors directly, performs preliminary processing, and communicates with the general-purpose processor only when complex processing is required. This intermediary role improves overall system productivity by reducing the communication overhead and task switching required if a single processor handled all functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7386352B2Modular sensor network node
Publication Date: 2008.06.10 SANDIA NAT LAB
  • US7386352B2 patent drawing
  • US7386352B2 patent drawing
  • US7386352B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A distributed wireless sensor network node is disclosed. The wireless sensor network node includes a plurality of sensor modules coupled to a system bus and configured to sense a parameter. The parameter may be an object, an event or any other parameter. The node collects data representative of the parameter. The node also includes a communication module coupled to the system bus and configured to allow the node to communicate with other nodes. The node also includes a processing module coupled to the system bus and adapted to receive the data from the sensor module and operable to analyze the data. The node also includes a power module connected to the system bus and operable to generate a regulated voltage.