Modular Shed Packaging via Living Hinge Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sheds are cumbersome to construct, difficult to disassemble, and require significant time, labor, and maintenance due to their heavy and bulky materials, leading to high shipping costs and limited consumer accessibility.

Innovation Solution

A modular shed constructed from lightweight blow-molded plastic components that are easily interconnected and disassembled, featuring living hinges for efficient assembly and reconfiguration, and designed for compact packaging to reduce shipping costs and enhance portability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional sheds are constructed from heavy materials like wood or metal, then structural strength and durability are improved, but weight increases making them difficult to transport and assemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite construction combining lightweight blow-molded plastic panels with internal metal or wooden support frames. This composite approach provides the necessary structural strength while keeping the overall weight low enough for easy transport and assembly by consumers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The shed is divided into separate modular components including walls, roof, floor, and door panels that can be manufactured independently and transported separately. These segmented components are designed to be easily assembled together, reducing the weight handling requirements during transport and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional sheds are built with numerous interconnected parts and fasteners, then structural integrity is improved, but assembly time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The shed structure is segmented into modular panels with standardized connection interfaces. Each panel is designed as a discrete unit that can be quickly attached to adjacent panels using simple connection mechanisms, eliminating the need for complex assembly procedures while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Connection features such as interlocking edges, overlapping panels, and integrated fasteners are merged into the panel designs themselves rather than requiring separate components. This integration simplifies the assembly process by combining multiple functions into single connection elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If conventional sheds are constructed with large packaging for shipping, then component protection during transport is improved, but shipping costs and packaging size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidpackaging volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The shed components are designed to nest within each other or pack efficiently in a compact configuration. Panels can be stacked or interlocked in a space-saving manner that minimizes packaging volume while still providing adequate protection during transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging design utilizes three-dimensional stacking and vertical arrangement of components to maximize space utilization. By organizing components in multiple dimensions rather than simple linear arrangement, the packaging volume is significantly reduced while maintaining component protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If conventional wooden sheds are used, then structural strength is improved, but maintenance requirements increase due to rotting and deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The material composition is changed from natural wood to blow-molded plastic, which fundamentally alters the durability parameters. The plastic material is inherently resistant to rot, corrosion, and weathering, eliminating the need for periodic maintenance while maintaining or improving structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The use of composite materials combines the strength benefits of traditional construction materials with the durability advantages of plastic. The resulting structure maintains structural integrity while being completely resistant to the deterioration that plagues traditional wooden sheds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS7779579B2Packaging system for a modular enclosure
Publication Date: 2010.08.24 LIFETIME PRODUCTS
  • US7779579B2 patent drawing
  • US7779579B2 patent drawing
  • US7779579B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular enclosure may include a number of interlocking components, such as panels, that may be interconnected to form sidewalls, roof and/or floor. In particular, the modular enclosure may consist of a shed and the shed may be packaged within a container. For example, the shed may constructed from a number of outer wall panels and corner panels. The corner panels preferably include a living hinge that allows the corner panel to be moved between a generally planar position and an angled position. Advantageously, the wall panels and the corner panels may be capable of being stacked within the container to facilitate packaging of the shed when the corner panels are in the generally planar position.