Modular Shoulder Jig for Glenoid Component Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional shoulder replacement surgery techniques lack precision and accuracy in guiding the placement of the glenoid component, often relying on two-dimensional imaging methods like X-rays or 2D CT scans, which fail to provide accurate three-dimensional measurements, leading to increased surgical time, blood loss, and the risk of infection, and require patient-specific, non-reusable instruments that are costly and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A pre-assembled modular jig that uses measurements from 3D imaging like CT scans or MRI scans to guide the placement of the glenoid component in shoulder replacement surgery, ensuring precise alignment and sizing in three dimensions, reducing the need for arbitrary calculations and minimizing bone and blood loss, while being reusable and user-friendly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional two-dimensional imaging methods (X-rays or 2D CT scans) are used for guiding glenoid component placement, then the surgical procedure can be performed with standard equipment, but the precision and accuracy of placement is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement accuracyVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional imaging methods to three-dimensional imaging (CT or MRI scans) to achieve accurate measurement of glenoid version, inclination, and other anatomical parameters. This dimensional upgrade enables precise preoperative planning and accurate intraoperative guidance for glenoid component placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If patient-specific non-reusable instruments are used for each surgery, then the placement can be customized for each patient, but the cost and preparation time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific customizationVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preoperative planning using 3D imaging to create a customized surgical plan before the actual surgery. This preliminary action includes measuring glenoid version, inclination, and other parameters, and preparing the appropriate cutting guide and positioning jig configurations in advance, thereby reducing intraoperative time and preparation burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting guide and positioning jig are designed as universal instruments that can be used across multiple patients and surgical cases. Through modular design and adjustable components, these instruments accommodate different anatomical variations without requiring completely custom-made tools for each patient, thus reducing cost and preparation time while maintaining patient-specific accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If arbitrary calculations are performed for glenoid placement angles, then the surgical procedure is simplified, but the accuracy and precision of placement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical procedure simplicityVSAvoidplacement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a cutting guide as an intermediary tool that physically translates the preoperatively determined accurate measurements into intraoperative guidance. The cutting guide incorporates the precise glenoid version, inclination, and other parameters measured from 3D imaging, providing a mechanical mediator between the digital plan and the actual surgical execution, thereby maintaining both simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If conventional guiding instruments are used without three-dimensional measurements, then the surgical equipment remains simple, but the surgical time and risk of infection increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical efficiencyVSAvoidinfection risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs all critical measurements and planning actions preoperatively using 3D imaging, determining glenoid version, inclination, and component positioning before the patient enters the operating room. This preliminary preparation reduces the duration of the actual surgical procedure by eliminating time-consuming intraoperative measurements and calculations, thereby reducing surgical time and associated infection risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12161351B2Jig for guiding placement of glenoid component of the implant in shoulder replacement surgery
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 SHAH MANISH
  • US12161351B2 patent drawing
  • US12161351B2 patent drawing
  • US12161351B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a jig for shoulder replacement surgery. In particular the present invention provides a pre-assembled jig that facilitates and guides the placement of glenoid component of the implant in shoulder replacement surgery. The present jig (P) is pre-assembled to ensure precision alignment, placing and sizing of the glenoid component of the implant for shoulder replacement surgery based on the difference of cuts in millimeters instead of the usual version measurements in degrees. The present invention (P) guides the glenoid component of shoulder replacement in the precise position and thereby provides accuracy in placement of the component.